Skip to main content
NCBI home page
RSC Advances logoLink to RSC Advances
. 2020 Jan 14;10(5):2453–2461. doi: 10.1039/c9ra09729e

Synthesis and characterization of thermoresponsive ZIF-8@PNIPAm-co-MAA microgel composites with enhanced performance as an adsorption/release platform†

Juan A Allegretto 1,2, Juan M Giussi 1, Sergio E Moya 3, Omar Azzaroni 1,✉, Matias Rafti 1,✉
PMCID: PMC9048415  PMID: 35496105

Abstract

Composite materials featuring a synergic combination of interesting properties such as stimuli responsiveness and tailored porosity are highly appealing due to their multiple possible applications. We hereby present an example which brings together such features by using poly(N-isopropyl-acrylamide)-derived thermo-responsive microgels and Zn-based Metal Organic Framework (MOF) ZIF-8, capable of selective adsorption. Such a composite was obtained by including methacrylic acid as a co-monomer in the microgel, in order to position carboxylic acid moieties within the polymeric matrix, which via preconcentration of MOF precursors would trigger confined heterogeneous nucleation. The highly integrated composite obtained features thermoresponsivity and permanent porosity. Methylene blue adsorption/desorption experiments were performed, revealing a dramatic enhancement of its cargo capacity together with an increased release efficiency.

We hereby present a composite material which combines porosity (ZIF-8 MOF) and stimuli-responsiveness (PNIPAm-co-MAA microgel) in a synergistic way thus opening the path for its use in adsorption and sensing applications.graphic file with name c9ra09729e-ga.jpg

Introduction

In the last few decades, functional organic–inorganic composite materials have attracted a great deal of attention due to the multiple possibilities arising from a synergic combination of its constituents.1,2 Examples of such synergy were reported in the recent literature; e.g., composites built from polymers and metallic nanoparticles (NPT) were shown to feature stimuli-responsiveness (towards electric fields, ionic strength, temperature or pH variations), thus allowing interesting applications.3–6 From the vast palette of stimuli-responsive polymeric materials, microgels have often been employed due to their chemical versatility and straightforward synthesis, which typically yields monodisperse distributions of micrometer-sized particles.7,8 Among the most popular applications of microgels, examples dealing with controlled nucleation of crystalline solids,9 separations,10 biomedicine,11,12 and drug delivery13 can be mentioned. In particular, poly(N-isopropyl-acrylamide)-PNIPAm-microgels constitute a suitable thermoresponsive platform for many of the above-discussed examples.14 Responsiveness of PNIPAm arises from a change in the relative strength of solvent–monomer and monomer–monomer interactions; i.e., at low temperatures a solvated (swollen) microgel configuration dominates, while as temperature increases, solvent-monomer interactions become weaker, ultimately triggering a transition into desolvated (unswollen) state. The characteristic temperature for such transition is known as the lower critical solution temperature or LCST (typically ≈30 °C for PNIPAm).15–17 LCST and other key features of PNIPAm microgels (e.g.; size, exposed chemical moieties, pH responsiveness, or surface charge) are highly dependent on polymer structure and can be modified by including different co-monomers (e.g.; methacrylic acid (MAA) for pH-responsiveness and surface charge modulation).18–20 Quite recently, ionic microgels have been used as platforms for synthesis of metallic NPT; a two-step procedure consisting in diffusion of metal precursors followed by chemical treatment,21,22 yield composites featuring photoluminescence, modified magnetic properties or surface-enhanced Raman scattering.23–26

An appealing approach for the modification of the above discussed organic–inorganic composites would be; e.g., to replace metallic NPT with other nanostructures. Recent examples deal with the possibility of using SiO2 nanoparticles as cores from which microgels can be grown in order to achieve core–shell structures that retain the key feature of volume phase transition.27,28 An interesting further development of such a strategy could be to replace the SiO2 core with a different material capable of conferring porosity and/or tailored affinity for targeted adsorbates. Metal Organic Frameworks or MOFs are ideal candidates for this purpose, given that suitable methods for synthesizing such composites become available. MOFs can be best described as spatially extended crystalline porous solids, composed of metallic ion centers (or clusters containing metallic ions), non-covalently linked by multidentate organic molecules.29,30

Although not extensively explored, there are some recent examples of polymer-MOF composites.31 Namely, the synthesis of poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene composites with water-sensitive Zn-based MOF-5 (which results in an increased stability towards hydrolysis, without compromising available pore volume),32,33 the use of surface-grafted MOF particles integrated with PNIPAm as thermoresponsive emulsifiers and drug-delivery platforms,34,35 and the use of hydrogels containing MOFs for adsorption from aqueous environments.36 Inspired by such examples and the already reported possibility of combining colloidal templates and nanostructures,37,38 we envisioned the possibility of synthesizing well dispersed polymer-MOF composites following a straightforward approach; i.e., by using pre-designed microgel particles featuring moieties able to trigger MOF heterogeneous nucleation, which would add microporosity to the thermoresponsive polymer. The main drive for such interest was to explore the possibility of attaining further control over adsorption–desorption processes, colloidal stability, and the integration of further components in the composite (e.g.; metallic nanoparticles) for additional functionality. In order to explore this concept, we have chosen an archetypal member of the Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework (ZIFs) MOF subclass, known as ZIF-8 (composed by Zn2+ ions tetrahedrally coordinated by 2-methylimidazolate anionic linkers) and extensively used in photocatalysis,39,40 biocatalysis,41,42 and drug delivery43,44 applications. ZIF-8 features sodalite-like topology with BET surface areas up to ≈1900 m2 g−1, relatively high thermal/chemical stability, and eminently hydrophobic micropores (1.16 nm diameter and 0.34 nm pore window).45 Thorough characterization of the composite was carried, confirming the presence of a well-integrated microporous ZIF-8 phase within the polymer matrix. Afterwards, experiments oriented to demonstrate the suitability of the composite for adsorption/desorption of selected analytes were conducted with methylene blue (MB) aqueous solutions.46 Such experiments show that the obtained composite features a synergic combination of its components and is capable of outperforming ZIF-8 MOF as adsorbent platform; i.e., it was observed a three-fold increase for its maximum loading capacity, and a ten-fold increase of its release efficiency.

Experimental

Materials

N-Isopropylacrylamide (NIPAm, Mw = 113.16 g mol−1), N,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide (BIS, Mw = 154.17 g mol−1), ammonium persulfate (APS, Mw = 228.20 g mol−1), methacrylic acid (MAA, Mw = 86.09 g mol−1), zinc nitrate hexahydrate (ZnN), 2-methylimidazole (HmIm), sodium chloride, methylene blue (MB) and anhydrous methanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Ultrapure Milli-Q water (18.24 MΩ cm) was used for all the aqueous solutions.

Microgel synthesis

1.358 g of NIPAm and 0.043 g of N,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide (BIS) were dissolved in 100 mL of Milli-Q water (1 : 0.023 molar ratio) and heated under stirring to 70 °C while purging with N2 in a 250 mL three-neck round-bottom flask. Then, 0.148 g of MAA were added for a final 1 : 0.143 molar ratio of NIPAm : MAA, under continuous stirring. Next, 0.046 g of APS dissolved in 1 mL Milli-Q water at room temperature were added to the reaction mixture (for a final 1 : 0.017 NIPAm : APS molar ratio). After 4 hours of synthesis, a microgel dispersion was obtained and then purified by (3×) sequential centrifugation/re-dispersion procedure followed by freeze-drying.

ZIF-8 synthesis

ZIF-8 MOF was synthesized by mixing equal volumes of methanolic 25 mM Zn(NO3)2 –ZnN– and 50 mM 2-methylimidazole-HmIm-solutions at 25 °C. After 1 hour reaction time, dispersions obtained were centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 30 minutes and re-dispersed three times in NaCl 5 mM solution. Concentrations were determined via dry weight with TGA to be 1.6 ± 0.1 mg mL−1.

ZIF-8@microgel synthesis

Freeze-dried microgel samples were dispersed using ZIF-8 metallic precursor ZnN 25 mM solution (final concentration 1 mg mL−1 microgel) and kept one week under controlled temperature (4 °C) in order to ensure complete pre-concentration of the metal ion in the polymeric matrix. Afterward, a 50 mM methanolic solution of HmIm linker was added in order to yield a final (1 : 2) Zn : HmIm stoichiometric molar ratio. After 1 hour synthesis, dispersions obtained were centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 30 minutes in a Heraeus Biofuge 22R with an HFA 1494 rotor, and re-dispersed in NaCl 5 mM three times. Moderate ionic strengths were needed while manipulating microgels in aqueous environments in order to reach its full swollen state.19 As presented in ESI†, synthesized materials exposed to aqueous environments for 5 months were found to remain stable, supporting the possibility of re-use in cyclic procedures.

Characterization techniques used

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) measurements were carried using a Zetasizer Nano-ZS90 (Malvern Instruments Ltd.), and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering (WAXS) in a Xeuss 1.0 HR SAXS/WAXS, XENOCS, Grenoble setup (INIFTA, project “Nanopymes”, EuropeAid/132184/D/SUP/AR-Contract 331-896, UNLP-CONICET) with a microfocus X-ray source and Pilatus 100K detector (Dectris, Switzerland, distance sample-detector: 97.95 mm). 1H-NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Brucker 500 MHz) experiments were performed using deuterated methanol. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) experiments were carried using Pt pans under 60 mL min−1 N2 flow; all samples were kept at 100 °C until constant weight to ensure proper drying, and then the temperature was ramped (5 °C min−1) up to 900 °C (TGA Q500, TA Instruments). Surface area determination was carried with an ASAP 2020 HD88 surface area and porosity analyzer (Micromeritics). TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy) images were obtained using JEM 1200EX II (Jeol) apparatus using (when required) phosphotungstic acid negative staining as a contrast agent. A UV-Vis spectrometer Ocean Optics USB4000 spectrometer was employed to perform the UV-Vis spectra presented. Raman vibrational spectra were obtained with an i-Raman Plus (B&W Tek inc.) apparatus, using a 785 nm light source. Integration time was set to 5000 ms, with a time average of 100 and a 50% laser intensity.

Results and discussion

Microgel and ZIF-8@microgel synthesis and characterization

By means of free-radical precipitation copolymerization, thermoresponsive poly(N-isopropyl-acrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) or poly(NIPAm-co-MAA) microgels with 81% NIPAm-19% MAA composition were obtained (see ESI† for further details about synthesis procedures and NIPAm : MAA ratio calculation from NMR).19 Taking advantage of the affinity between carboxylate moieties and Zn2+ ions, microgels were used as soft preconcentration platforms, which then allowed for confined ZIF-8 growth (hereafter referred as ZIF-8@microgel).47 Reaction time needed for composite synthesis was determined by mixing methanolic solutions of ZIF-8 precursors at 25 °C while continuously monitoring hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) via DLS. The final stage of particle growth is attained after 1 hour reaction time (Dh ≈ 400 nm, see Fig. S1†), and therefore the same value was used for ZIF-8@microgel synthesis. As presented in Fig. 1a, Dh corresponding to bare microgel particles (≈739 nm) is slightly smaller than ZIF-8@microgel (≈795 nm). The fact that no additional particles with different size distribution were observed suggest that heterogeneous nucleation within the microgel is greatly enhanced over homogeneous ZIF-8 nucleation.20 Further evidence of the suggested confined growth can be obtained from DLS autocorrelation curves (Fig. 1a, inset). Bare microgel and ZIF-8@microgel diffusion coefficients were determined to be 1.09 μm2 s−1 to 0.33 μm2 s−1, respectively, which is a strong indication of increasingly compact particles compatible with ZIF-8 integration to the polymeric matrix. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was employed for determination of the ZIF-8/microgel relative amounts (see Fig. 1b), using onset and magnitude of thermal events registered, a 50% w/w composition can be derived.

Fig. 1. (a) Hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) (intensity distribution) of ZIF-8 particles after one-hour synthesis and comparison with 1 mg mL−1 microgel dispersion in 25 mM Zn(NO3)2 methanolic solution, and the as-prepared ZIF-8@microgel dispersion. Inset: autocorrelation curves. (b) Thermogravimetric experiments for quantification of ZIF-8 and microgel content in the composite.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

As presented in Fig. 2a, the sequence of events leading to composite formation were characterized by different techniques: firstly, Zn2+ ions complexation by MAA groups was probed throughout Raman vibrational spectroscopy, as displayed in Fig. 2b. Spectra obtained for bare ZIF-8, bare microgel, and ZIF-8@microgel composite, feature characteristic vibrational modes; namely, 175 cm−1 (Zn–N stretching mode) and 686 cm−1 (HmIm ring Pickering mode). As shown in the enlarged wavenumber region, bare microgel presents a composed signal arising from NIPAm and MAA contributions (NIPAm signal at 1650 cm−1 and MAA signal at 1710 cm−1), however, for ZIF-8@microgel composite only the signal corresponding to NIPAm is present. The absence of MAA contribution supports the proposed partial coordination of Zn2+ with carboxylic moieties present in the microgel. Additional evidence was provided through pH values of native dispersions, see ESI.† Secondly, ZIF-8 network formation was probed by WAXS. Diffractograms displayed at Fig. 2c evidence high crystallinity for the MOF present in the composite, with no significant differences with the results obtained for bare ZIF-8.

Fig. 2. (a) Schematic representation of Zn2+ ions preconcentration by MAA monomers from the microgel matrix and the subsequent ZIF-8 formation. (b) Raman vibrational spectra for ZIF-8 powder, dry microgel, and dry ZIF-8@microgel. Highlighted wavenumber region where C Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 O peaks appear. (c) Diffraction patterns from WAXS experiments.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

In order to explore the close integration achieved between microgel and MOF, 1H-NMR experiments were carried; while signals obtained coincide with those expected for ZIF-8 and microgel (see Fig. S2†), nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) reveals a clear coupling between imidazolic signals and those rising from the microgel network. As presented in Fig. 3, coupling between 1 ppm signal arising from MAA methylene groups and NIPAm moieties, and 3.8 ppm and 7.1 ppm signals corresponding to imidazole ring, rules out the possibility of phase segregation, since coupling is mediated by dipole–dipole interactions between non-bonded moieties, only possible if separation lengths are lower than 6 Å.

Fig. 3. Nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) analysis for ZIF-8@microgel composite material. Dashed area marks features arising from coupling between imidazolate and microgel signals.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Having established the presence of ZIF-8 in the microgel, experiments oriented to determine the presence of porosity and surface area inherent to MOF were carried. Results of N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K are presented in Fig. 4; a steep increase in the adsorbed volume typical of IUPAC type I isotherms together with BJH-derived pore size distribution maximum at 1.1 nm (Fig. 4, inset) were observed.45 Determined BET surface area was 632 ± 5 m2 g−1 (with no significant difference with Langmuir analysis, 666 ± 6 m2 g−1). Having in mind that microgel contribution to the surface area can be considered negligible, and using TGA-determined weight composition (50%, see Fig. 1b), it can be assumed that ZIF-8 porosity (∼1200 m2 g−1) remains available when assembled in the composite (see ESI† for further details on the calculations).

Fig. 4. N2 adsorption isotherm for ZIF-8@microgel composite. Inset: pore size distribution by BJH method.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Morphology and mesoscopic organization of the synthesized materials were studied with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The use of a staining agent (phosphotungstic acid) in order to confer electronic contrast was necessary only for bare microgel due to the electron-dense MOF phase present in the composite. TEM images are presented in Fig. 5. As can be seen, the presence of ZIF-8 across the microgel particle is evident, supporting the proposed confined nucleation and growth process and the structural integration of the composite (for size distribution analysis, see ESI†).

Fig. 5. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images of (a) stained bare microgel particles at 8k and (b) non-stained microgel particles at 120k magnification. ZIF-8@microgel particles at (c) 8k and (d) 120k magnification, both without staining agent.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Microgel and ZIF-8@microgel thermoresponsive behaviour

The question of whether the thermoresponsive behavior of the microgel is affected or not by the presence of ZIF-8 in the composite was addressed by DLS experiments. Hydrodynamic diameters corresponding to microgel and ZIF-8@microgel dispersions prepared in 5 mM NaCl were compared (concentrations determined by dry weight were 1.73 ± 0.01 and 1.7 ± 0.2 mg mL−1 respectively); results are displayed in Fig. 6. At 25 °C (swollen state) Dh determined values were quite similar for both materials; while at 45 °C (collapsed state) a notorious difference appeared. The collapse of the composite microparticles is hindered by the presence of the less-compressible ZIF-8 phase, causing a difference of approx. 160 nm (as already reported for similar metallic NPT@microgel composites).28,48

Fig. 6. Size transition comparison for microgel and ZIF-8@microgel particles between 25 °C and 45 °C as measured from DLS experiments.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Methylene blue (MB) adsorption and desorption

Having characterized the integration between MOF and polymeric matrix in the composite, its chemical structure, morphology, and thermal responsiveness; we focused on exploring possible uses as adsorption–desorption platforms, considering the demonstrated available porosity present. For this end, methylene blue (MB) aqueous stock solutions were exposed to homogeneous dispersions of ZIF-8, bare microgel, and ZIF-8@microgel composite (see Scheme 1a). In order to ensure equilibrium state, contact time used was 48 h; afterward, suspensions were centrifuged, and equilibrium MB concentrations were determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy (see Scheme 1b). Adsorbent containing MB was then re-dispersed in NaCl 5 mM and left 48 h in order to determine MB release, which was quantified as a percentage (release efficiency, % RE) of the MB originally adsorbed in the considered support (further details on the procedure followed can be found at ESI†).

Scheme 1. MB adsorption (a) and release (b) for ZIF-8, microgel, and ZIF-8@microgel.

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

Low-concentration limit adsorption isotherms obtained are presented in Fig. 7; interestingly, and despite the differences between Langmuir model ideal adsorbent and the complex composite solid hereby considered, all the measured isotherms can be reasonably well fitted, with some minor differences for ZIF-8@microgel at 25 °C. Langmuir model, from which parameters characterizing adsorption were obtained, can be expressed as follows:graphic file with name c9ra09729e-t1.jpgwhere Ce and Qe are the determined equilibrium values for MB concentration in the liquid phase and mass loading (adsorbed amount) in the adsorbent; while Q0 and KL are the values obtained from Langmuir model fitting, corresponding to high-concentration limit adsorbed amount and the adsorption constant, related to the Gibbs free energy of adsorption according to ΔG0 = RT ln(KL).

Fig. 7. Equilibrium isotherms for MB adsorption and Langmuir fits using bare microgel, ZIF-8 and ZIF-8@microgel adsorbent at 25 °C (left, swollen state) and 45 °C (right, collapsed state). Full lines correspond to Langmuir fits.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

A comparison of Q0 values obtained for the different isotherms fitted to experimental data is presented in Fig. 8. It is worth mentioning that Q0 obtained for ZIF-8 suspensions can be considered as a lower-limit value, given that the expected particle aggregation in aqueous environments in aqueous environments would hinder adsorbate access to the total available porosity.

Fig. 8. Comparison of Q0 parameters as calculated from Langmuir isotherm fit at 25 °C and 45 °C. Linear refers to a Q0 calculated value assuming the weight composition derived from TGA experiments and linear contributions of both components.

Fig. 8

Open in a new tab

Fig. 8 clearly shows that ZIF-8@microgel adsorbent outperforms both bare microgel and ZIF-8, even considering what could be expected from a simple linear combination of the contributions. In order to assess the potential of ZIF-8@microgel composite for; e.g., drug-delivery applications, the release of adsorbed MB was tested using adsorbent phase exposed to MB solutions corresponding to initial concentrations of 0.04 mg mL−1 (see ESI† for details). Release efficiency (RE), was calculated for each adsorbent as the amount of MB released with respect to the initial amount adsorbed (relevant contact time values were used for release experiments; i.e., 48 h), see Fig. 9. Values obtained suggest that, while contact time is clearly not sufficient for reaching desorption equilibrium, there is an evident improvement on the RE for the composite. ZIF-8 RE is quite small at both temperatures compared with bare microgel and ZIF-8@microgel, which show considerable temperature dependence. Bare ZIF-8 is a strong adsorbent (ΔHads = −13.7 kJ mol−1 as derived from Gibbs free energy of adsorption); however, a marked RE increase can be observed for both, microgel and ZIF-8@microgel, which amounts to approx. a 10-fold increase and almost a 3-fold increase when comparing with values corresponding to 25 °C and 45 °C respectively. Such marked temperature dependence can be understood in terms of structural changes occurring in the microgel structure when transitions between collapsed and swollen states occur. In the collapsed microgel (45 °C), NIPAm–NIPAm hydrophobic interactions prevail and provoke particle core to become increasingly hydrophobic, together with segregation of free MAA moieties towards particle surface, this generates an increased negative surface charge.49 Both effects cause an increased affinity between MB and the microgel resulting thus in a lower RE value for the collapsed state (45 °C). Regarding the enhanced release observed for the composite at 25 °C, it can be rationalized by considering an equilibrium between MB adsorbed in the microporous environment provided by ZIF-8 and MB adsorbed in regions corresponding to free microgel chains (responsible for temperature triggered transitions). As MB desorbs from polymeric environment towards solution, ZIF-8-adsorbed MB (which act as a reservoir) is continuously released to compensate such release.

Fig. 9. Release Efficiency – RE after 48 h, using initial MB concentrations C0 = 0.04 mg mL−1 for ZIF-8, microgel, and ZIF-8@microgel adsorbent.

Fig. 9

Open in a new tab

Conclusions

We hereby report for the first time on the use of Poly(N-isopropyl-acrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) (poly(NIPAm-co-MAA)) thermoresponsive microgel as a macromolecular template for ZIF-8 confined heterogeneous nucleation. The strategy followed was to synthesize a microgel featuring MAA moieties, which can act as Zn2+ partial coordination sites, and via supersaturation effect, trigger confined MOF heterogeneous nucleation, both phenomena proved by Raman spectroscopy and WAXS experiments. The highly integrated (as observed via NMR) ZIF-8@microgel synthesized material retains both high surface area and thermal responsiveness.

MB adsorption/desorption experiments reveal a clear synergy when comparing ZIF-8@microgel performance versus what could be expected from the combined contributions of bare ZIF-8 and microgel separately. ZIF-8 was demonstrated to be a strong adsorbent but a poor delivery platform due to a very low release efficiency (RE). The use of ZIF-8@microgel composite was shown to cause an overall improvement of adsorption/desorption performance. The observed effect of temperature variations on RE (i.e., RE-25 °C > RE-45 °C) for the composite allows foreseeing potential applications for its use as drug release platform. The general principles hereby described can be applied with little modification to diverse MOFs and stimuli-responsive polymeric materials, which we believe will open the path for many interesting applications of such nanocomposites.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

RA-010-C9RA09729E-s001

Acknowledgments

M. R., J. M. G., and O. A. are CONICET staff members. J. A. A. wants to acknowledge Jorge L. Llanos, Edgardo A. Fertitta and Ethel S. Flores for the help and discussion regarding TGA and N2 uptake experiments, Lorena Cortez for graphical material, and CONICET for a doctoral scholarship.

†

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details, data processing details, NMR, and TEM results. See DOI: 10.1039/c9ra09729e

Notes and references

  1. Faustini M. Nicole L. Ruiz-hitzky E. Sanchez C. History of Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Materials: Prehistory, Art, Science, and Advanced Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28:1704158. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201704158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gomez-Romero P. Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Materials—In Search of Synergic Activity. Adv. Mater. 2001;13:163–174. doi: 10.1002/1521-4095(200102)13:3<163::AID-ADMA163>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stuart M. A. C. Huck W. T. S. Genzer J. Müller M. Ober C. Stamm M. Sukhorukov G. B. Szleifer I. Tsukruk V. V. Urban M. Winnik F. Zauscher S. Luzinov I. Minko S. Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:101–113. doi: 10.1038/nmat2614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shiotani A. Mori T. Niidome T. Niidome Y. Katayama Y. Stable incorporation of gold nanorods into N-isopropylacrylamide hydrogels and their rapid shrinkage induced by near-infrared laser irradiation. Langmuir. 2007;23:4012–4018. doi: 10.1021/la0627967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nguyen M. Felidj N. Mangeney C. Looking for Synergies in Molecular Plasmonics through Hybrid Thermoresponsive Nanostructures. Chem. Mater. 2016;28(11):3564–3577. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Qian Z. Ginger D. S. Reversibly Reconfigurable Colloidal Plasmonic Nanomaterials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:5266–5276. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thorne J. B. Vine G. J. Snowden M. J. Microgel applications and commercial considerations. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2011;289(5–6):625–646. doi: 10.1007/s00396-010-2369-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nayak S. Andrew Lyon L. Soft nanotechnology with soft nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005;44:7686–7708. doi: 10.1002/anie.200501321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Diao Y. Helgeson M. E. Myerson A. S. Hatton T. A. Doyle P. S. Trout B. L. Controlled Nucleation from Solution Using Polymer Microgels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:3756–3759. doi: 10.1021/ja110801g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaşgöz H. Özgümüş S. Orbay M. Modified polyacrylamide hydrogels and their application in removal of heavy metal ions. Polymer. 2003;44:1785–1793. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00033-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Saunders B. R. Laajam N. Daly E. Teow S. Hu X. Stepto R. Microgels: from responsive polymer colloids to biomaterials. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;147–148:251–262. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2008.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nguyen M. K. Alsberg E. Bioactive factor delivery strategies from engineered polymer hydrogels for therapeutic medicine. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014;39:1235–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ramos J. Imaz A. Callejas-Fernández J. Barbosa-Barros L. Estelrich J. Quesada-Pérez M. Forcada J. Soft nanoparticles (thermo-responsive nanogels and bicelles) with biotechnological applications: from synthesis to simulation through colloidal characterization. Soft Matter. 2011;7:5067. doi: 10.1039/C0SM01409E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pérez-Juste J. Pastoriza-Santos I. Liz-Marzán L. M. Multifunctionality in metal@microgel colloidal nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2013;1:20–26. doi: 10.1039/C2TA00112H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu J. Zhou B. Hu Z. Phase Behavior of Thermally Responsive Microgel Colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003;90:048304. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.048304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Saunders B. R. On the Structure of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Microgel Particles. Langmuir. 2004;20:3925–3932. doi: 10.1021/la036390v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hashmi S. M. Dufresne E. R. Mechanical properties of individual microgel particles through the deswelling transition. Soft Matter. 2009;5:3682. doi: 10.1039/B906051K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tauer K. Gau D. Schulze S. Völkel A. Dimova R. Thermal property changes of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) microgel particles and block copolymers. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2009;287:299–312. doi: 10.1007/s00396-008-1984-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Giussi J. M. Velasco M. I. Longo G. S. Acosta R. H. Azzaroni O. Unusual temperature-induced swelling of ionizable poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based microgels: experimental and theoretical insights into its molecular origin. Soft Matter. 2015;11:8879–8886. doi: 10.1039/C5SM01853F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rafti M. Allegretto J. A. Segovia G. M. Tuninetti J. S. Giussi J. M. Bindini E. Azzaroni O. Metal–organic frameworks meet polymer brushes: enhanced crystalline film growth induced by macromolecular primers. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017;1:2256–2260. doi: 10.1039/C7QM00235A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Akamatsu K. Shimada M. Tsuruoka T. Nawafune H. Fujii S. Nakamura Y. Synthesis of pH-Responsive Nanocomposite Microgels with Size-Controlled Gold Nanoparticles from Ion-Doped, Lightly Cross-Linked Poly(vinylpyridine) Langmuir. 2010;26:1254–1259. doi: 10.1021/la902450c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang J. Xu S. Kumacheva E. Polymer microgels: reactors for semiconductor, metal, and magnetic nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:7908–7914. doi: 10.1021/ja031523k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Álvarez-Puebla R. A. Contreras-Cáceres R. Pastoriza-Santos I. Pérez-Juste J. Liz-Marzán L. M. Au@pNIPAM Colloids as Molecular Traps for Surface-Enhanced, Spectroscopic, Ultra-Sensitive Analysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009;48:138–143. doi: 10.1002/anie.200804059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang L. Zhao X. Zhang Y. Zhang W. Ren T. Chen Z. Wang F. Yang H. Fabrication of intelligent poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/silver nanoparticle composite films with dynamic surface-enhanced Raman scattering effect. RSC Adv. 2015;5:40437–40443. doi: 10.1039/C5RA04361A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tan L. Liu J. Zhou W. Wei J. Peng Z. A novel thermal and pH responsive drug delivery system based on ZnO@PNIPAM hybrid nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2014;45:524–529. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen L.-Y. Ou C.-M. Chen W.-Y. Huang C.-C. Chang H.-T. Synthesis of Photoluminescent Au ND–PNIPAM Hybrid Microgel for the Detection of Hg2+ ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2013;5:4383–4388. doi: 10.1021/am400628p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Karg M. Pastoriza-Santos I. Liz-Marzán L. M. Hellweg T. A versatile approach for the preparation of thermosensitive PNIPAM core–shell microgels with nanoparticle cores. ChemPhysChem. 2006;7:2298–2301. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200600483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Karg M. Wellert S. Pastoriza-Santos I. Lapp A. Liz-Marzán L. M. Hellweg T. Thermoresponsive core–shell microgels with silica nanoparticle cores: size, structure, and volume phase transition of the polymer shell. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008;10:6708. doi: 10.1039/B802676A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li S. Huo F. Metal-organic framework composites: from fundamentals to applications. Nanoscale. 2015;7:7482–7501. doi: 10.1039/C5NR00518C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stock N. Biswas S. Synthesis of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Routes to Various MOF Topologies, Morphologies, and Composites. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:933–969. doi: 10.1021/cr200304e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zimpel A. Preiß T. Röder R. Engelke H. Ingrisch M. Peller M. Rädler J. O. Wagner E. Bein T. Lächelt U. Wuttke S. Imparting Functionality to MOF Nanoparticles by External Surface Selective Covalent Attachment of Polymers. Chem. Mater. 2016;28:3318–3326. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. McDonald K. A. Feldblyum J. I. Koh K. Wong-Foy A. G. Matzger A. J. Polymer@MOF@MOF: ‘grafting from’ atom transfer radical polymerization for the synthesis of hybrid porous solids. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:11994–11996. doi: 10.1039/C5CC03027G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gamage N. D. H. McDonald K. A. Matzger A. J. MOF-5-Polystyrene: Direct Production from Monomer, Improved Hydrolytic Stability, and Unique Guest Adsorption. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55:12099–12103. doi: 10.1002/anie.201606926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nagata S. Kokado K. Sada K. Metal–organic framework tethering PNIPAM for ON–OFF controlled release in solution. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:8614–8617. doi: 10.1039/C5CC02339D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yao B. Fu Q.-J. Li A.-X. Zhang X.-M. Li Y.-A. Dong Y.-B. A thermo-responsive polymer-tethered and Pd NP loaded UiO-66 NMOF for biphasic CB dechlorination. Green Chem. 2019;21:1625–1634. doi: 10.1039/C8GC03651A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maan O. Song P. Chen N. Lu Q. An In Situ Procedure for the Preparation of Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 Polyacrylamide Hydrogel for Adsorption of Aqueous Pollutants. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;6(19):1801895. doi: 10.1002/admi.201801895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pileni M.-P. The role of soft colloidal templates in controlling the size and shape of inorganic nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 2003;2:145–150. doi: 10.1038/nmat817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Betke U. Lieb A. Micro-Macroporous Composite Materials - Preparation Techniques and Selected Applications: A Review. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018;20:1800252. doi: 10.1002/adem.201800252. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Duan J. Chen S. Zhao C. Ultrathin metal-organic framework array for efficient electrocatalytic water splitting. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang Y. Li Q. Liu C. Shan X. Chen X. Dai W. Fu X. The promoted effect of a metal-organic frameworks (ZIF-8) on Au/TiO2 for CO oxidation at room temperature both in dark and under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal., B. 2018;224:283–294. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wu X. Ge J. Yang C. Hou M. Liu Z. Facile synthesis of multiple enzyme-containing metal–organic frameworks in a biomolecule-friendly environment. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:13408–13411. doi: 10.1039/C5CC05136C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hou C. Wang Y. Ding Q. Jiang L. Li M. Zhu W. Pan D. Zhu H. Liu M. Facile synthesis of enzyme-embedded magnetic metal-organic frameworks as a reusable mimic multi-enzyme system: mimetic peroxidase properties and colorimetric sensor. Nanoscale. 2015;7:18770–18779. doi: 10.1039/C5NR04994F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sun C. Y. Qin C. Wang X. L. Yang G. S. Shao K. Z. Lan Y. Q. Su Z. M. Huang P. Wang C. G. Wang E. B. Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 as efficient pH-sensitive drug delivery vehicle. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:6906–6909. doi: 10.1039/C2DT30357D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vasconcelos I. B. Da Silva T. G. Militão G. C. G. Soares T. A. Rodrigues N. M. Rodrigues M. O. Da Costa N. B. Freire R. O. Junior S. A. Cytotoxicity and slow release of the anti-cancer drug doxorubicin from ZIF-8. RSC Adv. 2012;2:9437–9442. doi: 10.1039/C2RA21087H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Park K. S. Ni Z. Cote A. P. Choi J. Y. Huang R. Uribe-Romo F. J. Chae H. K. O'Keeffe M. Yaghi O. M. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006;103:10186–10191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602439103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Li C. He Y. Zhou L. Xu T. Hu J. Peng C. Liu H. Fast adsorption of methylene blue, basic fuchsin, and malachite green by a novel sulfonic-grafted triptycene-based porous organic polymer. RSC Adv. 2018;8:41986–41993. doi: 10.1039/C8RA09012B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. O'Neill L. D. Zhang H. Bradshaw D. Macro-/microporous MOF composite beads. J. Mater. Chem. 2010;20:5720. doi: 10.1039/C0JM00515K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Das M. Sanson N. Fava D. Kumacheva E. Microgels loaded with gold nanorods: photothermally triggered volume transitions under physiological conditions. Langmuir. 2007;23:196–201. doi: 10.1021/la061596s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sanz B. von Bilderling C. Tuninetti J. S. Pietrasanta L. Mijangos C. Longo G. S. Azzaroni O. Giussi J. M. Thermally-induced softening of PNIPAm-based nanopillar arrays. Soft Matter. 2017;13:2453–2464. doi: 10.1039/C7SM00206H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RA-010-C9RA09729E-s001
RA-010-C9RA09729E-s001.pdf (852KB, pdf)

Articles from RSC Advances are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES