Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;38(9):2397–2403. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac135

Table 2.

Comparison of fastISM with standard ISM for large models

Architecture Layers Input size Output size fast ISM Standard ISM
Akita 11 conv+max pool, 8 dilated conv block, 7 Conv2D blocks 1 048 576 99 681×5 6463 8700
(1.3)
Enformer 14 conv, 7 attention pool, 11 transformer + feed-forward blocks, 2 conv 196 608 896×5313 1642* 3792*
(2.3)
Same as above with compressed output 896×20 10 086 31 980
(3.2)
Same as above except with 4 transformer 896×20 4878 26 694
(5.5)

Note: All times in seconds per 100 input sequences for ISM of central 1000 bp windows, except the Enformer model with 896×5313 outputs for which central 100 bp windows were scored (*). Time relative to fastISM in parentheses.