Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 16;34(5):1912–1932. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac057

Table 1.

Grain quality traits of the NILs and the transgenic plants

Lines N Total Starch Content (%) Amylose Content (%) Total Protein Content (%) Albumin Content (mg/g) Glutelin Content (mg/g) Globulin Content (mg/g) Prolamin Content (mg/g) Total lipid Content (mg/g) Taste Value
NIL-WCR1-BL 5 84.1 ± 1.5 26.4 ± 0.8 7.1 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 0.5 61.3 ± 9.1 4.5 ± 0.4 2.6 ± 0.5 34.0 ± 0.3 64.0 ± 1.3
NIL-WCR1-J 5 79.8 ± 1.6 23.8 ± 1.0 9.3 ± 1.0 3.5 ± 0.3 82.0 ± 9.6 4.3 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.2 32.7 ± 0.9 60.6 ± 1.9
P-value **2.4 × 10−3 **2.1 × 10−3 **6.0 × 10−3 **9.0 × 10−3 **8.1 × 10−3 4.1 × 10−1 4.3 × 10−1 *1.8 × 10−2 *4.6 × 10−2
CO(+) 5 85.9 ± 3.6 25.0 ± 0.9 8.2 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.4 72.0 ± 3.4 5.0 ± 0.7 2.6 ± 0.5 38.8 ± 1.7 – 
CO(−) 5 80.6 ± 0.8 23.5 ± 0.6 10.0 ± 1.0 3.0 ± 0.1 89.5 ± 10.0 4.6 ± 0.3 2.9 ± 0.3 35.9 ± 0.9 – 
P-value *1.3 × 10−2 *1.2 × 10−2 **3.9 × 10−3 **5.1 × 10−3 **5.8 × 10−3 3.1 × 10−1 4.0 × 10−1 *1.1 × 10−2 – 
OX(+) 5 93.0 ± 2.0 17.0 ± 1.2 4.7 ± 0.6 2.5 ± 0.1 38.6 ± 6.0 3.4 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.3 35.6 ± 2.8 79.2 ± 1.4
OX(−) 5 87.5 ± 2.4 15.2 ± 0.7 6.2 ± 0.8 3.0 ± 0.1 52.1 ± 7.8 3.5 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.1 32.4 ± 0.9 74.7 ± 0.8
P-value **4.0 × 10−3 *2.0 × 10−2 **9.0 × 10−3 **9.0 × 10−4 *1.5 × 10−2 5.9 × 10−1 5.1 × 10−2 *3.6 × 10−2 *2.9 × 10−2
wcr1-1 5 84.4 ± 2.1 15.9 ± 0.3 8.0 ± 0.5 3.1 ± 0.2 70.9 ± 5.3 3.5 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 0.5 33.0 ± 0.8 – 
WT 5 90.6 ± 2.8 18.7 ± 0.7 6.1 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 0.1 52.2 ± 8.6 3.2 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.2 34.9 ± 1.3  –
P-value **4.1 × 10−3 **2.6 × 10−5 **3.2 × 10−3 **2.8 × 10−4 **3.3 × 10−3 2.0 × 10−1 2.4 × 10−1 *3.8 × 10−2  –

n, number of plants; (+) and (−), transgene positive and negative plants, respectively; taste value, a comprehensive assessment of the viscosity, hardness, and appearance of cooked rice. Samples consisted of at least 300 grains per genotype. All data are means ± sem. P-values were determined by two-tailed t tests, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01.