Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 31;10(9):5212–5219. doi: 10.1039/c9ra09873a

Ozone catalytic decomposition comparison of the catalysts in this study and in publications.

Catalyst Conc.a (ppm) RHb (%) SVc (mL g−1 h−1) S BET d (m2 g−1) Conv.e (%) Rate (mmol g−1 h−1) SAf (mmol m−2 h−1)
MnO2 120 50 600 000 90 63 2.0 2.3 × 10−2
MIL-100(Fe) 45 45 200 000 1726 100 0.4 2.3 × 10−3
Ce-OMS-2 40 90 600 000 200 90 0.96 4.8 × 10−3
α-MnO2 14 ∼1 660 000 80.7 100 0.41 5.1 × 10−3
α-MnO2 50 22 540 000 52.4 99 1.2 2.3 × 10−2
70 25 0.3 5.8 × 10−3
H-MnO2 120 50 600 000 228 60 1.9 8.5 × 10−3
H-δ-MnO2 3000 Dry 600 000 206 100 80 3.9 × 10−1
MnFe0.5Ox 10 000 90 12 000 262 90 4.8 1.8 × 10−2
MnOx 1000 Dry 120 000 116.2 98.5 5.3 4.5 × 10−2
CoOx 1000 Dry 120 000 67.0 88.1 4.7 7.0 × 10−2
Ag-H-MCM 4400 Dry 114 000 574 97.8 22 3.8 × 10−2
LaFe0.95Ni0.05O3 1000 Dry 240 000 18.7 97.7 10 5.3 × 10−1
RH 93 9.9 5.3 × 10−1
Cu2O-1 : 2.5 1000 Dry 240 000 26.5 100 10.7 4 × 10−1
90 100 10.7 4 × 10−1
Cu2O-1 : 2.5 3000 Dry 240 000 26.5 100 32 1.2
90 95 31 1.17
a

Ozone initial concentration.

b

Relative humidity.

c

Space velocity.

d

Specific surface area determined by BET method.

e

Ozone conversion.

f

Surface specific catalytic activity.