Table 1:
Comparison of Triticum aestivum L. genome assemblies
| Parameter | Renan (this study) | Chinese Spring RefSeq_v2.1 (Zhu et al. [22]) |
|---|---|---|
| No. of contigs | 12,982 | 306,746 |
| Cumulative size (bp) | 14,001,122,256 | 14,317,423,665 |
| N50 (bp) | 2,159,703 | 341,062 |
| L50 | 1,958 | 12,223 |
| N90 (bp) | 598,285 | 32,302 |
| L90 | 6,645 | 59,261 |
| NG50* (bp) | 1,973,000 | 322,161 |
| LG50 | 2,202 | 13,254 |
| NG90* (bp) | 264,272 | 16,550 |
| LG90 | 8,816 | 85,688 |
| Longest contig (bp) | 15,116,687 | 3,528,546 |
| No. of chromosomes | 21 | 21 |
| Cumulative size (bp) | 14,195,643,615 | 14,225,829,371 |
| N501 (bp) | 703,299,328 | 713,360,512 |
| L50 | 10 | 10 |
| N901 (bp) | 520,815,552 | 518,332,608 |
| L90 | 19 | 19 |
| Longest (bp) | 854,463,248 | 851,934,019 |
| % of N | 1.78 | 1.52 |
| BUSCO on assemblies (%) (N = 4,896) | ||
| Complete | 99.1 | 99.3 |
| Duplicated | 94.7 | 96.1 |
| Fragmented | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Missing | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Base accuracy—quality value (k-mer) | 32.8 | 44.5 |
| No. of genes | 109,552 | 107,891 |
| Mean No. of exons | 5.10 | 5.33 |
| BUSCO on gene predictions (%) (N = 4,896) | ||
| Complete | 99.1 | 99.5 |
| Duplicated | 94.6 | 98.2 |
| Fragmented | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Missing | 0.7 | 0.4 |
1
Calculated using a genome size of 15 Gb.