Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 25;10(14):8055–8065. doi: 10.1039/d0ra00320d

Effect of Fe, Co and Ni promoters on formation energy of CUS.

Mo substitution No Fe Co Ni
S edge
CUS formation energy (kJ mol−1) 223.7 179.1 160.6 47.4
Edge graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u2.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u3.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u4.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u5.jpg
Edge with CUS graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u6.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u7.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u8.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u9.jpg
Mo edge
CUS formation energy (kJ mol−1) 80.8 42.2 41.8 −66.3
Edge graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u10.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u11.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u12.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u13.jpg
Edge with CUS graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u14.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u15.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u16.jpg graphic file with name d0ra00320d-u17.jpg