Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 10;46(5):1059–1067. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00992-2

Table 2.

Partial correlations between whole-body fat mass and whole-body fat-free mass from bioelectrical impedance analysis and neuroimaging outcomes adjusted for covariates.

Bioelectical impedance Neuroimaging outcome r CI 95% Adjusted variance explained p value
Whole-body fat mass Brain volume −0.07 [−0.09, −0.06] 0.005 1.772×10−19 *
GM volume −0.11 [−0.13, −0.1] 0.012 2.925×10−47 *
WM volume −0 [−0.02, 0.01] −0.0001 0.533
Global Efficiency 0.001 [−0.01, 0.02] −0.0001 0.823
Local Efficiency 0.001 [−0.02, 0.02] −0.0001 0.887
Whole-body-fat free mass Brain volume −0.12 [−0.14, −0.11] 0.014 1.439×10−53 *
GM volume −0.17 [−0.18, −0.15] 0.028 5.772×10−101 *
WM volume −0.03 [−0.05, −0.02] 0.0009 0.000037 *
Global Efficiency 0.004 [−0.01, 0.02] −0.0001 0.588
Local Efficiency 0.003 [−0.01, 0.02] −0.0001 0.688

Significant results, at the p = 0.05 level, are shown in bold and with *.