Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 10;46(5):1059–1067. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00992-2

Table 3.

Partial correlations between indicators of body composition derived from abdominal MRI and neuroimaging outcomes adjusted for covariates.

Abdominal MRI Brain MRI r CI 95% Adjusted variance explained p value Significant
Visceral adipose tissue volume Brain volume −0.072 [−0.1, −0.05] 0.00486 1.928×10−07 *
GM volume −0.096 [−0.12, −0.07] 0.00888 4.279×10−12 *
WM volume 0.023 [0.05, 0.0] 0.00018 0.085
Global efficiency −0.011 [−0.02, 0.04] 0.00031 0.441
Local efficiency −0.018 [−0.01, 0.05] 0.0001 0.217
Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue volume Brain volume −0.067 [−0.09, −0.04] 0.00419 0.000001 *
GM volume −0.094 [−0.12, −0.07] 0.0085 1.178×10−11 *
WM volume −0.018 [−0.05, 0.01] 0.00004 0.184
Global efficiency 0.015 [−0.01, 0.05] 0.00019 0.289
Local efficiency 0.01 [−0.02, 0.04] 0.00034 0.498
Total adipose tissue volume Brain volume −0.112 [−0.13, −0.09] 0.012 2.679×10−21 *
GM volume −0.08 [−0.1, −0.06] 0.00614 1.157×10−11 *
WM volume −0.021 [−0.04, 0.0] 0.00016 0.075
Global efficiency 0.006 [−0.02, 0.03] 0.00028 0.649
Local efficiency 3E-04 [−0.02, 0.02] 0.0003 0.979
Lean tissue volume (normalized by body weight) Brain volume 0.048 [0.03, 0.07] 0.002 0.00004 *
GM volume 0.046 [0.02, 0.07] 0.001878 0.000093 *
WM volume 0.032 [0.01, 0.06] 0.000762 0.0065 *
Global efficiency 0.005 [−0.02, 0.03] 0.000283 0.649
Local efficiency 3E−04 [−0.02, 0.02] 0.000316 0.979

Significant results, at the p = 0.05 level, are shown in bold and with *.