Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;10:851616. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.851616

Table 5.

The impact of formal and informal social support on the utilization of inpatient healthcare services.

Variable Model 5 (t) Model 6 (t) Model 7 (t) rural Model 8 (t) urban
Control variable
Gender 0.642 (1.304) 0.712 (1.681) 0.891 (1.922) 0.836 (1.748)
Age 1.613** (2.682) 1.743*** (4.011) 1.568*** (3.354) 2.841*** (5.991)
Marriage 0.841 (1.781) 0.992 (1.994) 1.442 (2,762) 1.543 (3,475)
Education 0.887 (1.876) 0.976** (1.623) 0.774** (1.669) 0.697 (1.439)
Political status 0.066 (0.182) 0.078 (0.114) 0.091 (0.253) 0.079 (0.174)
Income 1.671** (3.871) 1.439** (2.954) 1.441** (2.878) 1.935 (4.397)
ADL −1.899*** (−3.624) −2.309*** (3.471) −2.472*** (4.425) −2.844** (−4.893)
Formal social support
Health insurance 0.712** (1.367) 0.647*** (1.291) 1.382 (3.446)
Pension 0.819** (1.445) 0.916*** (2.113) 0.814 (1.509)
Frequency of contact with government staff 2.357 (3.861) 4.114 (5.911) 2.361 (3.348)
Health insurance satisfaction 1.887** (3.618) 1.231* (3.772) 2.006*** (4.045)
Pension insurance satisfaction 1.466** (2.433) 1.096 (1.984) 2.761** (3.998)
Informal social support
Children's communication frequency 1.382* (2.435) 3.241*** (3.967) 2.336** (3.892)
Children's financial support 2.438 (4.951) 2.589** (4.769) 1.613 (2.315)
Frequency of helping each other with neighbors 1.471*** (2.492) 0.928 (1.661) 1.893*** (3.945)
Frequency of communication with neighbors 1.997*** (3.774) 1.308 (2.953) 2.412** (4.631)
P-Value 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

***, **, and * were significant at 1, 5, and 10% levels respectively. t-values are in parentheses.