Table 7.
Oaxaca blinder decomposition.
| Control variable | Regression coefficient | Robust standard errors | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | −0.057 | 0.007 | −3.121 |
| Age | 0.014 | 0.002 | 4.762 |
| Marriage | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.893 |
| Education | 0.012 | 0.004 | 6.961 |
| Political status | 0.007 | 0.003 | 8.927 |
| Income | −0.114 | 0.063 | −6.302 |
| ADL | −0.067 | 0.067 | −14.396 |
| Formal social support | −2.276 | ||
| Health insurance | 0.103 | 0.094 | 5.125 |
| Pension | −0.081 | 0.815 | −5.882 |
| Frequency of contact with government staff | 0.074 | 0.072 | 8.363 |
| Health insurance satisfaction | 0.152 | 0.714 | 18.182 |
| Pension insurance satisfaction | 0.022 | 0.091 | 26.051 |
| Informal social support | 51.839 | ||
| Children's communication frequency | 0.086 | 0.019 | 6.321 |
| Children's financial support | 0.147 | 0.087 | 16.053 |
| Frequency of helping each other with neighbors | 0.176 | 0.098 | 18.014 |
| Frequency of communication with neighbors | 0.018 | 0.104 | 10.049 |
| Feature effect | 0.012 | 0.147 | 70.3 |
| Coefficient effect | 0.452 | 0.382 | 29.7 |
| Urban | 0.394 | 0.471 | 10.8 |
| Rural | 0.281 | 0.265 | 18.9 |