Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 15;9:848432. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.848432

Table 2.

Summary of quantitative data analysis.

Indexes Pooled data Groups Participants Random effects SMD (95% CI) I2 (%) P for heterogeneity
Superoxide dismutase vs. model group 9 211 1.57 (1.16, 1.98) 94.90% P < 0.05
vs. Western medicine group 8 191 0.56 (0.19, 0.92) 94.50% P < 0.05
Malonicaldehyde vs. model group 9 211 −1.5 (1.88, −1.17) 91.10% P < 0.05
vs. Western medicine group 8 191 −0.64 (−0.95, −0.33) 83.60% P < 0.05
Glutathione peroxidase vs. model group 3 50 6.13 (4.74, 7.6) 51.40% P = 0.128
vs. Western medicine group 2 30 1.46 (0.62, 2.29) 38.30% P = 0.203
Glucose vs. model group 3 59 −0.73 (−1.27, −0.19) 54% P = 0.114
vs. Western medicine group 2 38 1.123 (0.374, 1.873) 90.80% P < 0.05
Serumcreatinine vs. model group 4 77 −1.404 (−1.953, −0.856) 86.20% P < 0.05
vs. Western medicine group 3 56 0.471 (−0.061, 1.003) 0.00% P = 0.983
Blood urea nitrogen vs. model group 5 93 −2.026 (−2.569, −1.483) 79.90% P < 0.05
vs. Western medicine group 4 72 −0.247 (−0.753, 0.260) 85.20% P < 0.05
Urinary protein excretion vs. model group 2 31 −1.370 (−2.255, −0.486) 90.50% P < 0.05
vs. Western medicine group 2 30 −0.245 (−0.966, 0.476) 0% P = 0.552