Table 1.
Biochemical compositions of leaves in two tea cultivars under different shading periods.
| Cultivar | Shading periods (day) | Theanine | Caffeine | DL-C | EC | ECG | GCG | EGC | EGCG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XFL | 0 | 10.55 ± 0.23bc | 35.58 ± 1.92c | 6.48 ± 0.38a | 7.32 ± 0.03a | 11.21 ± 0.21b | 6.82 ± 0.65b | 32.52 ± 0.72a | 50.50 ± 1.04b |
| 4 | 11.89 ± 0.09a | 42.57 ± 0.47b | 6.80 ± 0.06a | 7.72 ± 0.47a | 11.82 ± 0.75b | 9.17 ± 0.96a | 24.87 ± 0.64b | 49.74 ± 0.31b | |
| 12 | 10.90 ± 0.11b | 51.83 ± 1.79a | 4.09 ± 0.96b | 4.29 ± 0.13c | 9.16 ± 0.73c | 5.38 ± 0.53b | 8.51 ± 1.02d | 31.36 ± 0.84c | |
| 16 | 10.08 ± 0.48c | 44.55 ± 0.99b | 5.87 ± 0.28a | 6.36 ± 0.44b | 14.45 ± 0.26a | 5.49 ± 0.82b | 23.51 ± 0.33c | 59.49 ± 1.17a | |
| JXL | 0 | 5.10 ± 0.20b | 27.29 ± 1.29c | 3.90 ± 0.57a | 6.49 ± 0.47a | 6.47 ± 0.37bc | 3.57 ± 0.25a | 19.51 ± 0.64a | 27.86 ± 0.12b |
| 4 | 7.28 ± 0.23a | 30.61 ± 1.64b | 4.16 ± 0.31a | 6.01 ± 0.68a | 7.54 ± 1.10b | 3.02 ± 0.09b | 13.00 ± 0.33c | 27.28 ± 0.54b | |
| 12 | 7.74 ± 0.01a | 34.73 ± 1.25a | 2.93 ± 0.30b | 4.35 ± 0.32b | 5.90 ± 0.23c | 2.90 ± 0.31bc | 12.35 ± 0.22c | 22.87 ± 1.20c | |
| 16 | 5.07 ± 0.05b | 31.75 ± 0.29b | 4.35 ± 0.56a | 6.16 ± 0.54a | 11.75 ± 0.32a | 2.58 ± 0.19c | 16.05 ± 0.14b | 39.26 ± 2.38a |
Concentrations (dry weight, mg/g). Data were presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation) and were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test. DL-C, Catechin; EC, (–)-Epicatechin; ECG, (–)-Epicatechin gallate; GCG, (–)-Gallocatechin gallate; EGC, (–)-Epigallocatechin; EGCG, (–)-Epigallocatechin gallate; XFL, leaf of “Xiangfeicui”; JXL, leaf of “Jinxuan”.
Different letters of same cultivar in row represent p < 0.05.