Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 10;11(3):927–940. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_644_21

Table 3.

GRADE recommendation for diabetes ketoacidosis for use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in DM patients

Certainty assessment № of patients Effect Certainty Importance



№ of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Adverse events comparison in SGLT2 Placebo group Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Events of DKA in SGLT2 inhibitors vs. Placebo
 16 RCT not serious not seriousa not serious not seriousb strong associationc 233/18956 (1.2%) 31/12300 (0.3%) RR 3.70 (2.58-5.29) 7 more per 1,000 (from 4 more to 11 more) ⨁⨁⨁⨁ HIGH Critical
Events of DKA in SGLT2 inhibitors vs. Placebo - Certain DKA
 16 RCT not serious not seriousa not serious not seriousb strong associationc 192/17194 (1.1%) 22/11303 (0.2%) RR 4.08 (2.70-6.17) 6 more per 1,000 (from 3 more to 10 more) ⨁⨁⨁⨁ HIGH Critical
Events of DKA in SGLT2 inhibitors vs. Placebo - Possible or Potential DKA
 2 RCT not serious not seriousa not serious not seriousb strong associationc 41/1762 (2.3%) 9/997 (0.9%) RR 2.60 (1.27-5.33) 14 more per 1,000 (from 2 more to 39 more) ⨁⨁⨁⨁ HIGH Critical

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; RCT: Randomized Clinical Trials Explanations. aAs I2=0%, hence low heterogeneity. bAs CI does not include one and overall information size is adequate; therefore, the outcome is precise. cAs RR is greater than 2, it is regarded as large effect