Table 3.
Construct validity measured with multitrait scaling analysis.
Subscale and item |
Corrected item-subscale correlation | Success ratea | ||
|
|
Convergent validity | Divergent validity | |
Engagement |
|
4/5 | 4/5 | |
|
Item 1 | 0.35 |
|
|
|
Item 2 | 0.61 |
|
|
|
Item 3 | 0.65 |
|
|
|
Item 4 | 0.53 |
|
|
|
Item 5 | 0.62 |
|
|
Functionality |
|
4/4 | 4/4 | |
|
Item 6 | 0.59 | ||
|
Item 7 | 0.55 |
|
|
|
Item 8 | 0.81 |
|
|
|
Item 9 | 0.73 |
|
|
Aesthetics | 3/3 | 3/3 | ||
|
Item 10 | 0.68 | ||
|
Item 11 | 0.84 |
|
|
|
Item 12 | 0.83 |
|
|
Information | 3/6 | 4/6 | ||
|
Item 13 | 0.24 | ||
|
Item 14 | 0.33 |
|
|
|
Item 15 | 0.74 |
|
|
|
Item 16 | 0.75 |
|
|
|
Item 17 | 0.39 |
|
|
|
Item 18 | 0.49 |
|
|
|
Item 19b | —c | — | — |
Subjective qualityd | ||||
|
Item 20 | 0.83 | — | — |
|
Item 21 | 0.84 | — | — |
|
Item 22 | 0.55 | — | — |
|
Item 23 | 0.78 | — | — |
aSuccess rate was defined as the rate of prespecified acceptable items among all items in each subscale.
bItem 19 was eliminated from the analysis because of missing values.
cNot applicable.
dSuccess rate was not calculated for subjective quality.