Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;24(4):e31889. doi: 10.2196/31889

Table 2.

Methodologic quality, cost, and funding of included studies.

Study Social media’s role in this intervention or outcome clearly reported This role quantifieda Social media described as effective Theoretical model application Conceptual model application Cost of intervention reported Funding source reported Sources of bias reported
Garett et al [23] Yes No Yes No No No Yes Recall
Young et al [24] Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Self-reported
Harding et al [25] Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access
Cao et al [26] Yes No Yes No No No No None
Sap et al [27] Yes No Yes No No No No Nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access; self-reported
Cole et al [28] Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes None
Hutchinson et al [29] No No Yes Transtheoretical model No No Yes Nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access
Goldenhersch et al [30] Yes Yes Yes Contemplation ladder No No Yes Short follow-up; self-reported
Cool et al, 2015 [31] Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes None
Hamill et al, 2015 [32] Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes None
Jiebing et al [33] Yes No Yes No No No Yes None
Mo et al [34] Yes No Yes Theory of planned behavior No No Yes Self-reported
Wu et al [35] No No No No No No Yes Nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access
Ahmad et al [36] Yes Yes Yes Social cognitive theory Yes No Yes Nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access; other selection bias
Cavalcanti et al [37] Yes Yes Yes No No No No Research team was not blinded to randomization
Chen et al [38] No No No COM-Bb and Behavior Change Wheel framework Yes No Yes Participants and researchers were not blinded
Todorovic et al [39] Yes No Yes No No No Yes No randomization
Chai et al [40] No No No No Yes No Yes Lost to follow-up
Lwin et al [41] No No No Protection motivation theory Yes No Yes Nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access
Pereira et al [42] Yes Yes No No No No No Nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access
Gamboa et al [43] Yes Yes Yes Social cognitive theory No No Yes Self-reported
Januraga et al [44] Yes No No Technology acceptance model No No Yes Nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access
Thammasarn and Banchonhattakit [45] No No No No No No Yes None
He et al [46] Yes No Yes No No No Yes None
Souza et al [47] No No No No No No No None
Chiu et al [48] Yes No Yes No No No No Self-reported; lost to follow-up; nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access
Chiu et al [49] Yes No No No No No No Self-reported; lost to follow-up; nonrepresentative of general population owing to internet or social media access
Purdy [50] Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes None
Parsapure et al [51] No No Yes No No No Yes None
Wu et al [52] Yes No Yes No No No Yes Lost to follow-up
Hutchinson et al [53] No Yes No No Yes No Yes Self-reported; interviewer bias
Diamond-Smith [54] Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Selection bias
Chang et al [55] Yes Yes No No No No No None

aQuantified through clicks, shares, comments, or other method of engagement.

bCOM-B: Capability Opportunity Motivation Behavior.