Table 3.
Characteristics of included studies (N=33).
| Study characteristics | Studies, n (%) | ||
| Country | |||
|
|
China | 8 (24) | |
|
|
Peru | 4 (12) | |
|
|
Brazil | 3 (9) | |
|
|
Othera | 19 (58) | |
| Social media platformb | |||
|
|
17 (52) | ||
|
|
8 (24) | ||
|
|
4 (12) | ||
|
|
Platform created for intervention | 4 (12) | |
|
|
YouTube | 3 (9) | |
|
|
3 (9) | ||
|
|
3 (9) | ||
|
|
1 (3) | ||
|
|
Multiple platforms | 6 (18) | |
| Methodologic quality | |||
|
|
The role of social media in this intervention or outcome was clearly reported | 24 (73) | |
|
|
This role was quantified through clicks, shares, comments, or other method of engagement | 14 (42) | |
|
|
Social media was described as effective | 22 (67) | |
|
|
A theoretical or conceptual model was used | 10 (30) | |
aArgentina, Cameroon, the Dominican Republic, Egypt, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Iran, Kenya, Malaysia, Serbia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, the Philippines, and Turkey.
bCategories are not mutually exclusive.