Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 29;22:171. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01962-8

Table 3.

Comparison of RV echocardiographic structural and functional parameters between the CTEPH patient and control groups

Parameters CTEPH group (n = 8) Control group (n = 8) P
RV structural parameters
 RVD (mm) 44.25 ± 7.25 32.04 ± 2.26 0.002
 LVD (mm) 33.88 ± 2.90 35.25 ± 2.38 0.317
 RVD/LVD 1.31 ± 0.26 0.91 ± 0.04 0.001
 EI 1.36 ± 0.12 1.06 ± 0.29  < 0.001
 Dmpap (mm) 30.68 ± 5.49 25.37 ± 1.50 0.020
RV function parameters
 RVLS (%) −17.13 ± 3.01 −23.80 ± 3.06 0.001
 TAPSE (mm) 16.50 ± 2.76 19.91 ± 1.48 0.008
 RV FAC (%) 28.28 ± 8.66 41.62 ± 2.44 0.003
 RIMP 0.72 ± 0.21 0.47 ± 0.04 0.005
 S’ (cm/s) 8.95 ± 1.15 13.02 ± 2.33 0.001

Data are expressed as mean ± SD. P values < 0.05 indicate statistically significant difference between patients and control groups and are emphasized in bold

RVD right ventricular diameter, LVD left ventricular diameter, EI eccentricity index, Dmpap main pulmonary artery diameter, RVLS RV longitude strain, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, RVFAC RV fractional area change, RIMP RV index of myocardial performance