Table 3.
The relative efficiency value of data envelopment analysis.
| Hospital Level | DMUs | TE | PTE | SE | RS | Relative validity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secondary hospital | HS1 | 0.836 | 0.860 | 0.972 | drs | Invalidity |
| HS2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | const | Validity | |
| HS3 | 0.271 | 0.335 | 0.811 | irs | Invalidity | |
| HS4 | 0.713 | 0.737 | 0.967 | irs | Invalidity | |
| HS5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | const | Validity | |
| HS6 | 0.626 | 0.898 | 0.696 | drs | Invalidity | |
| HS7 | 0.602 | 0.707 | 0.851 | drs | Invalidity | |
| HS8 | 0.906 | 1 | 0.906 | drs | Weak validity | |
| HS9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | const | Validity | |
| HS10 | 0.898 | 1 | 0.898 | drs | Weak validity | |
| HS11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | const | Validity | |
| HS12 | 0.706 | 1 | 0.706 | irs | Weak validity | |
| HS13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | const | Validity | |
| Tertiary hospital | HT1 | 0.795 | 1 | 0.795 | drs | Weak validity |
| HT2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | const | Validity | |
| HT3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | const | Validity | |
| HT4 | 0.973 | 1 | 0.973 | drs | Weak validity | |
| HT5 | 0.573 | 0.632 | 0.908 | drs | Invalidity |
Note: DUMs:Decision making units; TE: Technical efficiency; PTE: Pure technical efficiency; SE: Scale efficiency; RS: Return to scale; irs: Increasing; drs: Decreasing; const: constant.