Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 21;10(27):15800–15814. doi: 10.1039/d0ra01396j

The predicted binding free energy values and the individual energy components for the studied systems (kJ mol−1).

Complex ΔEvdwa ΔEelecb ΔEpolarc ΔEsasad ΔEbinde
Complex 1a −240.860 ± 25.595 −385.813 ± 77.663 611.431 ± 91.031 −29.851 ± 2.788 −45.093 ± 52.964
Complex 1b −286.898 ± 42.162 −606.797 ± 116.533 756.621 ± 157.705 −37.836 ± 7.553 −174.911 ± 110.390
Complex 1c −96.581 ± 30.324 −85.388 ± 55.586 233.675 ± 97.856 −11.581 ± 3.934 40.124 ± 67.288
Complex 2 −403.270 ± 91.270 −676.877 ± 205.008 946.819 ± 278.196 −48.592 ± 10.988 −181.920 ± 135.765
Complex 3 −250.508 ± 30.032 −362.350 ± 86.456 653.408 ± 119.333 −30.210 ± 2.657 10.341 ± 66.370
a

van der Waals energy.

b

Electrostatic energy.

c

Polar solvation energy.

d

Solvent Accessible Surface Area (SASA) energy.

e

Binding free energy. Every simulation is performed for 100 ns. Here complex 1a shows interaction between Xa21 and RaxX21-sY when OsSERK2 is present inside the complex, complex 1b shows interaction between Xa21 and OsSERK2 when RaxX21-sY is present and complex 1c for interaction between RaxX21-sY and OsSERK2 when Xa21 is present. Complex 2 indicates the interaction of Xa21 and OsSERK2 in the absence of RaxX21-sY and complex 3 shows interaction of Xa21 and RaxX21-sY in the absence of OsSERK2 inside.