. 2022 Mar 8;12(1):e12036. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12036

Table 3.

Logistic regression analyses: predictive modeling for pulmonary embolism, using D‐dimer threshold of 2 mg/L

	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3		Model 4
Predictor	Crude OR [95% CI]	P value	Adj OR^a [95% CI]	P value	Adj OR^a [95% CI]	P value	Adj OR^a [95% CI]	P value
Positive D‐dimer (>2 mg/L)	2.71 [1.11, 6.61]	0.028^*	2.85 [1.16, 7.01]	0.023^*	2.81 [1.14, 6.92]	0.025^*	3.03 [1.21, 7.59]	0.018^*
Age (years)	‐	‐	0.99 [0.97, 1.02]	0.72	0.99 [0.97, 1.02]	0.68	1.00 [0.97, 1.03]	0.87
Female	‐	‐	0.58 [0.24, 1.42]	0.23	0.55 [0.23, 1.37]	0.20	0.56 [0.23, 1.40]	0.22
Black	‐	‐	1.09 [0.46, 2.60]	0.85	1.07 [0.45, 2.57]	0.88	1.03 [0.43, 2.49]	0.94
BMI (kg/m²)	‐	‐	1.00 [0.94, 1.05]	0.89	0.99 [0.94, 1.05]	0.84	1.00 [0.94, 1.06]	0.96
RV Dysfunction on TTE	‐	‐	‐	‐	1.72 [0.59, 5.05]	0.33	‐	‐
Troponin (ng/mL)	‐	‐	‐	‐	‐	‐	0.0042 [10⁻⁶, 10.35]	0.17
AUC	0.62		0.66		0.68		0.71
Hosmer–Lemeshow GOF P value	n/a^b		0.98		0.94		0.45
Cross validated AUC	0.60		0.52		0.56		0.59
AIC	162		168		169		164

Abbreviations: Adj, adjusted; AIC, akaike information criterion; AUC, area under receiver operating curve; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; GOF, goodness‐of‐fit; OR, odds ratio; RV, right ventricular; TTE, transthoracic echocardiogram.

^{^a}

Adjusted for variables in the respective models.

^{^b}

Could not calculate due to limited outcome variability.

p < 0.05.