Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 4;2:30. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00096-6

Table 1.

Daytime assessments for the windowed and continuous approach.

Windowed (ONOFF) approach Continous (ON) approach
Weak responder Strong responder Weak responder Strong responder
Sham Verum Sham Verum statistics Sham Verum Sham Verum statistics
Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM) pcond pcondxresp Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM) pcond pcondxresp
Sleep questionnaire
 Sleep qualitya 4.6 (0.34) 4.56 (0.30) 3.96 (0.25) 3.87 (0.27) 0.40 0.46 4.49 (0.33) 4.34 (0.32) 3.62 (0.33) 3.91 (0.3) 0.54 0.08*
 Sleep deptha 3.05 (0.25) 2.96 (0.21) 2.67 (0.16) 2.52 (0.15) 0.12 0.66 2.97 (0.22) 2.76 (0.16) 2.52 (0.11) 2.43 (0.18) 0.17 0.35
MDBF
 Mood morningb 102.11 (3.10) 98.47 (4.52) 100.67 (5.44) 96.79 (5.84) 0.021* 0.74 102.68 (2.76) 100.27 (3.82) 98.08 (5.94) 94.83 (6.04) 0.011* 0.55
 Mood whole dayb 104.12 (2.45) 96.39 (6.2) 101.34 (4.94) 98.99 (4.94) 0.074* 0.55 103.36 (2.7) 103.31 (2.93) 100.99 (5.09) 95.36 (5.88) 0.038* 0.18
Sleepiness
 KSS moringa 3.09 (0.24) 3.07 (0.20) 3.61 (0.22) 3.76 (0.33) 0.77 0.81 3.01 (0.18) 3.1 (0.19) 3.85 (0.3) 3.8 (0.32) 0.98 0.36
 KSS 2pma 3.04 (0.27) 2.99 (0.28) 3.29 (0.18) 3.33 (0.39) 0.94 0.71 3.1 (0.35) 2.93 (0.28) 3.21 (0.16) 3.42 (0.27) 0.96 0.48
 KSS eveninga 3.3 (0.30) 3.14 (0.18) 3.7 (0.20) 3.87 (0.23) 0.41 0.71 3.38 (0.38) 2.85 (0.23) 3.39 (0.21) 4.12 (0.43) 0.57 0.02*
PVT
 Speed (1/RT)b 3.14 (0.1) 3.1 (0.1) 3.05 (0.12) 3.01 (0.09) 0.17 0.86 3.15 (0.1) 3.1 (0.09) 3.07 (0.13) 3.01 (0.08) 0.50 0.97
 10% slowest RT (ms)b 378.55 (16.13) 381.72 (15.04) 401.86 (24.9) 414.38 (18.56) 0.22 0.85 377.96 (20.23) 382.77 (15.93) 406.02 (30.91) 418.26 (16.84) 0.80 0.47
 10% fastest speed (1/RT)b 3.53 (0.09) 3.47 (0.10) 3.51 (0.10) 3.47 (0.08) 0.029* 0.73 3.51 (0.09) 3.48 (0.08) 3.52 (0.11) 3.46 (0.08) 0.77 0.88

Mood was assessed by the “Mehrdimensionaler Befindlichkeitsfragebogen” (MDBF). Sleepiness was assessed by the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS). PVT refers to a mobile version of the psychomotor vigilance task (10 min duration) to assess reaction time (RT). Cumulative link mixed model for ordinal data was used for all variables marked with a. Robust linear mixed models were performed to compare Sham to Verum nights for all interval scaled variables marked with b. P-value of factor Condition (cond, Sham vs Verum) and the interaction of condition and responder (resp, weak vs. strong) for each approach is reported in the statistics columns. Significant and trend-level p-values are marked with an asterisk (*).