Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;2:38. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00094-8

Table 3.

Antibiotic susceptibility classifier performance.

Antibiotic selection Best model class Prevalence Average precision AUROC
Vancomycin Gradient Boosted Tree 0.23 0.46 [0.40, 0.52] 0.72 [0.68, 0.75]
Ampicillin Gradient Boosted Tree 0.43 0.54 [0.49, 0.58] 0.62 [0.59, 0.65]
Cefazolin Gradient Boosted Tree 0.59 0.72 [0.68, 0.76] 0.67 [0.64, 0.70]
Ciprofloxacin Random Forest 0.63 0.73 [0.70, 0.76] 0.61 [0.58, 0.64]
Ceftriaxone Gradient Boosted Tree 0.66 0.79 [0.77, 0.82] 0.69 [0.66, 0.72]
Cefepime Random Forest 0.80 0.87 [0.84, 0.89] 0.65 [0.61, 0.69]
Vancomycin + Ceftriaxone Gradient Boosted Tree 0.81 0.87 [0.84, 0.89] 0.67 [0.63, 0.71]
Meropenem Gradient Boosted Tree 0.82 0.90 [0.88, 0.92] 0.69 [0.65, 0.72]
Pip-Tazo Random Forest 0.90 0.94 [0.92, 0.95] 0.64 [0.59, 0.69]
Vancomycin + Pip-Tazo Random Forest 0.96 0.98 [0.97, 0.99] 0.70 [0.62, 0.77]
Vancomycin + Cefepime Random Forest 0.97 0.98 [0.98, 0.99] 0.70 [0.62, 0.78]
Vancomycin + Meropenem Gradient Boosted Tree 0.98 0.99 [0.99, 0.99] 0.73 [0.65, 0.81]

Pip-Tazo = piperacillin/tazobactam.