Table 2. Multilevel models with wave and demographic variables predicting the log odds of social interactions.
No One | Partner | Family | Friends | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N observations | 15,201 | 10,295 | 15,201 | 15,201 | ||||
N participants | 188 | 124 | 188 | 188 | ||||
Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE | |
Fixed effects | ||||||||
Intercept | 0.62* | 0.29 | -1.29** | 0.50 | -1.53*** | 0.41 | -2.68*** | 0.37 |
Wave 2 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.37* | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.15 | -0.79*** | 0.20 |
Wave 3 | 0.26** | 0.09 | 0.32** | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.12 | -0.72*** | 0.15 |
Wave 4 | 0.36*** | 0.09 | 0.27* | 0.13 | -0.17 | 0.13 | -0.57*** | 0.16 |
Control variables | ||||||||
Age | -0.26** | 0.10 | 0.56*** | 0.15 | -0.34* | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.13 |
Gender (male) | -0.01 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.21 | -0.79*** | 0.22 | -0.03 | 0.20 |
Race (white) | 0.15 | 0.20 | -0.38 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 0.60* | 0.25 |
Living with spouse or partner | -1.09*** | 0.18 | -- | -- | 0.00 | 0.25 | -0.99*** | 0.23 |
College | 0.08 | 0.17 | -0.39 | 0.25 | -0.26 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.21 |
Working | -0.05 | 0.17 | -0.30 | 0.24 | -0.30 | 0.25 | -0.60** | 0.22 |
Income 1 ($30,000–$59,999) | -0.31 | 0.22 | 0.51 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.54 | 0.27 |
Income 2 ($60,000–$99,999) | -0.39 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.72* | 0.37 | 0.20 | 0.33 |
Income 3 (> = $100,000) | -0.21 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.71* | 0.36 | 0.71* | 0.33 |
Random effects | ||||||||
Intercept Var: wave:person | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.52 | ||||
Intercept Var: person | 0.79 | 0.98 | 1.56 | 0.90 | ||||
AIC | 18289.09 | 11800.48 | 11820.23 | 7085.72 | ||||
BIC | 18403.53 | 11901.83 | 11934.67 | 7200.16 | ||||
R2 conditional | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.36 | ||||
R2 marginal | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
Note.
* p < .05
** p < .01
*** p < .001. Wald tests were conducted only on fixed effects. Var = variance.