. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 29.

Published in final edited form as: School Ment Health. 2020 Jun 20;12(4):716–731. doi: 10.1007/s12310-020-09379-6

Table 3.

T1 and T2 mean (SD) scale scores by intervention group for Cambodian sample

Scale	Timepoint	Treatment	Control
Teacher - MHLS Recognition	T1	2.69 (.46)	2.41 (.43)
Teacher - MHLS Recognition	T2	2.68 (.50)	2.42 (.40)
Teacher - MHLS Help-seeking Self-efficacy	T1	2.63 (.68)	2.50 (.61)
Teacher - MHLS Help-seeking Self-efficacy	T2	2.69 (.80)	2.32 (.67)
Teacher – MHLS Stigma	T1	1 .71 (.40)	1.84 (.48)
Teacher – MHLS Stigma	T2	1 .54 (.62)	1.86 (.62)
Teacher – MHLS Willingness to Interact	T1	2.00 (.35)	1.84 (.49)
Teacher – MHLS Willingness to Interact	T2	2.45 (.39)^****	1.81 (.48)
Teacher – BMI Dangerousness	T1	2.81 (.69)	2.90 (.79)
Teacher – BMI Dangerousness	T2	2.08 (1.00)^***	2.93 (.73)
Teacher – BMI Poor skills	T1	1.89 (.74)	2.36 (.71)
Teacher – BMI Poor skills	T2	1.54 (.70)^*	2.20 (.68)
Teacher – BMI Incurable	T1	2.98 (.74)	2.87 (.72)
Teacher – BMI Incurable	T2	2.60 (.64)^**	2.91 (.60)
Student – MHL Knowledge	T1	0.57 (.13)	0.56 (.13)
Student – MHL Knowledge	T2	0.61 (.14)^**	0.54 (.12)
Student – Stigma	T1	4.05 (.69)	4.10 (.86)
Student – Stigma	T2	3.39 (.84)^****	4.02 (.77)

Notes:

=Range of the MHLS scales is 0 (“strongly disagree”) to 4 (“strongly agree”); range of BMI scales is 0 (“completely disagree”) to 4 (“completely agree”). Student – MHL Knowledge is proportion correct. Range of the Student – Stigma scale is 0 (“strongly disagree”) to 6 (“strongly agree”); Means are adjusted for T1 scores.

=p<.05

^**

=p<.01

^***

=p<.001

^****

=p<.0001