Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Oct 20;33(1):119–128. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01642

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The Think/No-Think task. A. The two phases of the task. Phase 1: learning of word pairs. Phase 2: Think/No-Think. On each trial, the left-hand word from a pair is shown either in green, cuing the subject to think about the target word, or in red, cuing the subjects to prevent the retrieval of the target word. B. Example trials where a Think and then a No-Think cue are shown for 3s, each followed by an intrusion rating asking whether/when the subject had an intrusion of the target word. On each trial, a single pulse of TMS is delivered at either 300ms, 400ms or 500ms after the cue (experimental trials) or at 250ms before the cue (baseline trials). C. Intrusion proportion for Think (green) and NT (red) trials across the 9 blocks. Early and late intrusions were collapsed leading to only two conditions: Intrusion and No-Intrusion. Intrusion proportion was calculated from 0 to 1 for each block (where a max of 1.0 means every NT or T trial in that block was coded as intrusion and 0 means no NT or T trial was coded as intrusion).