Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr;16(4):E184–E196. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7851

Table 1.

Most recent results from three randomized, controlled trials investigating PSA screening

PLCO (2017 update)15 ERSPC (2014 update)16 Goteborg (2014 update)17
n 76 683 162 243 20 000

Age 55–74 55–69 50–64

Site 10 US centers 8 European countries 1 city (Goteborg, Sweden)

Intervention PSA annually × 6 years annual DRE × 4 years PSA q4 years (in most centers) Some centers offered DRE PSA q2 years

Current median followup 15 years 13 years 18 years

Definition of positive test PSA >4 ng/ml Abnormal DRE PSA>3 ng/ml (most centers) PSA >2.5 ng/ml (from 2005 on) PSA >2.9 ng/ml (from 1999–2004) PSA>3.4 ng/ml (from 1995–98)

Prostate cancer deaths Control: 244
Screened: 255
Control: 545
Screened: 355
Control: 122
Screened: 79

Rate ratio for CSS (95% CI) 1.04 (0.87–1.24) 0.79 (0.69–0.91)
21% relative risk reduction in favor of screening
0.58 (0.46–0.72)
42% relative risk reduction in favor of screening

NNS N/A 1:781 1:139
NND N/A 1:27 1:13

CSS: Prostate cancer-specific survival; DRE: digital rectal exam; ERSPC: European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer; NNS: number needed to screen; NND: number needed to diagnose; PLCO: Prostate, Lung, Colon, and Ovarian screening trial; PSA: prostate-specific antigen.