Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 29;12:7003. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11137-4

Table 4.

Analysis of factors influencing lymph node metastasis in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Variables N Lymph node metastasis p value
Negative Positive
Total, n (%) 178 131 (73.6) 47 (26.4)
Age (yrs.)
 < 60 73 (41.0) 52 (39.7) 21 (44.7) 0.551
 ≥ 60 105 (59.0) 79 (60.3) 26 (55.3)
Gender
Female 46 (25.8) 28 (21.4) 18 (38.3) 0.053
Male 132 (74.2) 103 (78.6) 29 (61.7)
Tumor size (cm)
 < 3 74 (41.6) 64 (48.9) 10 (21.3) 0.001
 ≥ 3 104 (58.4) 67 (51.1) 37 (78.7)
Multiplicity
Single 66 (37.1) 56 (42.7) 10 (21.3) 0.009
Multiple 112 (62.9) 75 (57.3) 37 (78.7)
Tumor grade [n (%)]
Low 27 (15.2) 26 (19.8) 1 (2.1) 0.004
High 151 (84.8) 105 (80.2) 46 (97.9)
Pathological stage (pT) [n (%)]
T1-T2 61 (34.3) 54 (41.2) 7 (14.9) 0.001
T3-T4 117 (65.7) 77 (58.8) 40 (85.1)
NUSAP1 expression
40 (22.5) 36 (27.5) 4 (8.5)  < 0.001
 +  51 (28.7) 43 (32.8) 8 (17.0)
++ 44 (24.7) 29 (22.1) 15 (31.9)
+++ 43 (24.2) 23 (17.6) 20 (42.6)