Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;24(6):793–808. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01248-6

Table 2.

Overview of OS outcomes in thermal ablation

Author Lesion size (range) cm * No. CRLM 3–5 cm No. CRLM > 5 cm No. CRLM > 3 cm Median OS in months 1 yr OS
3–5 cm
2 yr OS
3–5 cm
3 yr OS 5 yr OS
3–5 cm  > 3 cm
Bale [43] 2 (0.5–13) 36 23 59 32

 > 3 cm: 31

 > 5 cm 29

86%^ 72%^ 36%^ 36%^
Fan [62] NS (till 5 cm) - - - 24 73%^ 41%^ 20%^ 10%^
Gwak [45] 2.4 (1–5) - - - Mean 39 - - 40% 27%
Hamada [46] 2.3 (0.5–9.0) - - 35 31 - - - -
Kennedy [48] 2.9 (1–8) - - 46 - 29  > 3 cm 93%  > 3 cm 70%^  > 3 cm 34%  > 3 cm 8%
Kim [49] 2.1 (0.5–6.2) - - 14 - -  > 3 cm 84%^  > 3 cm 53%^  > 3 cm 31%^  > 3 cm 31%^
Mao [51] 2.7 (0.9–4) - - - 32 - - - - -
Nielsen [27] 2.2 (0.2–8.0) 49 20 69 - 37 - - - -
Shady [53] 1.8 (0.5–5.7) - - 32 25  > 3 cm 88%^  > 3 cm 50%^  > 3 cm 26%^  > 3 cm 18%^
Shi [54] 2.7 (till 5 cm) 68 - - 26 - 92% ^ 55%^ 32%^ 20%^
Veltri [57] 2.5 (NS) - - 137 - 21.7  > 3 cm 74%^  > 3 cm 39%^  > 3 cm 30%^  > 3 cm 14%^
Wang [58] 2.8 (0.8–5) 52 - - 26 - 90% ^ 42% ^ 33%^ -
Wang [59] 2.5 (1–6.4) - - 32 - 22  > 3 cm 80%^  > 3 cm 30%^  > 3 cm 20%^  > 3 cm 10%^
Zhang [60] 3 (1–5) 51 (4–5 cm) - - 36 - - - - -

NS, not stated

*All-size CRLM included in study

^Percentages retrieved and estimated from OS curves