Table 4.
Social Provocation | Object Provocation | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step | Predictor | β | β SE | 95% CI | ∆R2 | df | F change | β | β SE | 95% CI | ∆R2 | df | F change | |
1 | Vignette: Anger | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.05-0.08 | 0.05 | 3,172 | 2.80* | 0.05 | 0.03 | -0.01-0.11 | 0.04 | 3,171 | 2.55 | |
Vignette: Hostile Intent Attribution | -0.04 | 0.03 | -0.10-0.02 | -0.00 | 0.02 | -0.05-0.04 | ||||||||
Vignette: Revenge Goals | 0.67* | 0.31 | 0.09–1.28 | 0.22 | 0.17 | -0.10-0.55 | ||||||||
2 | Vignette: Anger | 0.02 | 0.03 | -0.05-0.08 | 0.12 | 3,169 | 7.85*** | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.01-0.10 | 0.09 | 3,168 | 5.73** | |
Vignette: Hostile Intent Attribution | -0.05 | 0.03 | -0.11-0.02 | -0.01 | 0.02 | -0.05-0.03 | ||||||||
Vignette: Revenge Goals | 0.50 | 0.28 | -0.03–1.04 | 0.14 | 0.17 | -0.18-0.47 | ||||||||
VR: Anger | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.06-0.07 | -0.01 | 0.03 | -0.08-0.06 | ||||||||
VR: Hostile Intent Attribution | -0.03 | 0.04 | -0.10-0.04 | 0.07* | 0.03 | 0.01-0.14 | ||||||||
VR: Revenge Goals | 0.79*** | 0.19 | 0.42–1.13 | 0.35* | 0.16 | 0.02-0.65 | ||||||||
1 | VR: Anger | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.06-0.08 | 0.13 | 3,172 | 8.67*** | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.06-0.07 | 0.11 | 3,171 | 7.14*** | |
VR: Hostile Intent Attribution | -0.04 | 0.03 | -0.11-0.03 | 0.07* | 0.03 | 0.01-0.13 | ||||||||
VR: Revenge Goals | 0.83*** | 0.19 | 47–1.18 | 0.35* | 0.15 | 0.05-0.63 | ||||||||
2 | VR: Anger | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.06-0.07 | 0.03 | 3,169 | 2.15 | -0.01 | 0.03 | -0.08-0.06 | 0.02 | 3,168 | 1.31 | |
VR: Hostile Intent Attribution | -0.03 | 0.04 | -0.10-0.04 | 0.07* | 0.03 | 0.01-0.13 | ||||||||
VR: Revenge Goals | 0.79*** | 0.19 | 0.42–1.15 | 0.35* | 0.16 | 0.03-0.63 | ||||||||
Vignette: Anger | 0.02 | 0.03 | -0.05-0.08 | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.01-0.09 | ||||||||
Vignette: Hostile Intent Attribution | -0.05 | 0.03 | -0.12-0.02 | -0.01 | 0.02 | -.05-.03 | ||||||||
Vignette: Revenge Goals | 0.50 | 0.28 | -0.04–1.10 | 0.14 | 0.17 | -0.19-0.49 | ||||||||
1 | Vignette: Aggressive Responses | 0.68* | 0.26 | 0.19–1.21 | 0.06 | 1,174 | 11.12** | 0.44** | 0.15 | 0.16–74 | 0.05 | 1,173 | 9.80** | |
2 | Vignette: Aggressive Responses | 0.48 | 0.25 | -0.02–1.00 | 0.09 | 1,173 | 18.07*** | 0.30* | 0.14 | 0.02-0.58 | 0.07 | 1,172 | 14.04*** | |
VR: Aggressive Responses | 0.60*** | 0.15 | 0.33-0.89 | 0.53*** | 0.13 | 0.28-0.79 | ||||||||
1 | VR: Aggressive Responses | 0.68*** | 0.15 | 0.38-0.99 | 0.12 | 1,174 | 23.86*** | 0.62*** | 0.13 | 0.35-0.87 | 0.10 | 1,173 | 19.80*** | |
2 | VR: Aggressive Responses | 0.60*** | 0.15 | 0.32-0.90 | 0.03 | 1,173 | 5.78* | 0.53*** | 0.13 | 0.27-0.79 | 0.02 | 1,172 | 4.39* | |
Vignette: Aggressive Responses | 0.48 | 0.25 | -0.01-0.98 | 0.30* | 0.14 | 0.02-0.58 |
Hierarchical Regression Analyses were run for the Two Provocation Scenarios separately, both with Vignettes and VR Entered First. Model output is based on a non-bootstrapped procedure whereas output on separate predictors is based on a bootstrapping procedure
* p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001