Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 17;10(39):23108–23120. doi: 10.1039/d0ra01189d

Comparison of catalytic activity of our catalyst (Pd/Cu@GO) with previously reported Pd–Cu based catalysts for Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction.

Entry Catalyst Substrates Temperature reaction condition Reaction time (h) (reusability) Solvent Isolated yield (%) Reference
1 Pd/Cu@GO Aryl iodides and bromides with aliphatic and aromatic terminal alkynes 75 °C magnetic stirring 3–5 (10 cycles) Ethanol 45–99 Author's present work
2 rGO–CuPd Aryl iodides and bromides with phenyl acetylene 120 °C magnetic stirring 1–5 (5 cycles) DMF 70–96 2
3 Pd/Cu–ARF(ii) Aryl iodides and bromides with aliphatic and aromatic terminal alkynes 80 °C magnetic stirring N2 atmosphere 3–16 (5 cycles) CH3CN 77–95 7
4 MgO@PdCu Aryl iodides, bromides and chloride with aliphatic and aromatic terminal alkynes 60–120 °C magnetic stirring 6–24 (11 cycles) DABCO and DMF 10–99 23
5 MMT@Pd/Cu Aryl iodides with aliphatic and aromatic terminal alkynes 65 °C magnetic stirring N2 atmosphere 16 Ethanol 57–97 30
6 PdCu@GQD@Fe3O4 Aryl iodides, bromides and chloride with aromatic terminal alkynes 50–110 °C 8–48 (10 cycles) DABCO, toluene or DMA 76–99 37
7 Pd–CuFe2O4@SiO2 Aryl iodides and bromides with aromatic terminal alkynes 50 °C 24 (5 cycles) DABCO, DMA 68–98 67