Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 10;10(49):29475–29492. doi: 10.1039/d0ra05943a

Comparison between the conventional and microwave irradiation methods.

Comp. no. M. W Conv. Comp. no. M. W Conv.
T M (min) Y M (%) T c (min) Y c (%) T M (min) Y M (%) T c (min) Y c (%)
5a 3 85.57 360 67.44 8c 6 88.45 540 69.57
5b 4 93.53 480 59.71 9a 4 91.43 480 54.44
5c 3 86.51 420 69.55 9b 4 92.34 420 65.59
6a 3 85.47 360 57.73 9c 4 91.39 480 68.49
6b 6 93.50 480 59.81 12a 4 89.60 360 63.47
6c 3 86.58 420 69.66 12b 6 88.47 540 54.55
7a 3 85.51 360 57.65 12c 4 91.44 480 65.59
7b 4 93.61 480 59.60 13a 4 92.54 420 67.66
7c 3 86.59 420 63.63 13b 5 88.50 460 66.58
8a 4 91.48 480 57.65 13c 4 89.49 360 67.45
8b 4 89.55 360 68.54 13d 6 88.48 340 68.46