Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 28;10(53):31991–31996. doi: 10.1039/d0ra06212j

The obtained values of the FPL calculations.

No. Name F Max a W b ΔGEXPc
1 11r 857.5 ± 38.7d 94.6 ± 5.0d −9.23
2 13a 496.0 ± 32.5d 43.3 ± 3.9d −7.70
3 13b 884.2 ± 36.5d 91.9 ± 3.6d −8.45
4 11a 701.3 ± 54.1 70.7 ± 5.9 −9.96
5 11b 718.7 ± 46.8 74.3 ± 4.4 −10.13
6 Carmofur 421.5 ± 23.9 32.6 ± 1.8 −7.86
7 Disulfiram 371.3 ± 20.3 24.5 ± 1.9 −6.89
8 Ebselen 381.0 ± 34.0 23.5 ± 2.5 −8.45
9 PX-12 321.3 ± 26.5 16.5 ± 1.7 −6.39
10 Shikonin 327.9 ± 24.4 21.2 ± 2.1 −6.58
11 Tideglusib 351.8 ± 32.4 26.3 ± 2.4 −7.95
a

The obtained value of the mean rupture force FMax.

b

The recorded metric of the pulling work W.

c

The experimental binding free energy ΔGEXP was coarsely estimated via the reported IC50 (ref. 11–14) with a supposition that the IC50 value is equal to the inhibition constant ki.

d

The values were reported in the previous work.15 The calculated error was the standard error of the average. The unit is in kcal mol−1.