Comparison of the catalytic activity of Fe3O4@NFC-ImSalophCu nanocomposites with literature samples reported for the 1,2,3-triazole (11a) reaction.
Entry | Catalyst | Solvent | Time (min) | Temp. (°C) | Yield (%) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cu(ii)Br2BTP@TMSP–nSiO2 | EtOH/H2O | 25 | 85 | 98 | 51 |
2 | Amberlyst A-21 CuI | CH3CN | 60 | 89 | 89 | 52 |
3 | PEG-400, CuI | Water | 120 | r.t. | 74 | 53 |
4 | P4VPy–CuI | Water | 25 | Reflux | 89 | 54 |
5 | CuI/AK | Water | 20 | Reflux | 84 | 55 |
6 | Nano-Fe3O4@TiO2/Cu2O | Water | 20 | Reflux | 89 | 56 |
7 | Fe3O4@NFC-ImSalophCu | Water | 30 | 65 | 97 | This work |