Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;10(63):38158–38173. doi: 10.1039/d0ra06880b

Compilation of available experimental fusion temperatures and enthalpies Inline graphic for tris(β-diketonato)iron(iii) complexesa.

Complex T fus/K Inline graphic/kJ mol−1 Inline graphic b/kJ mol−1
1 2 3 4
Fe(acac)3 454 (25.9 ± 0.5)26 20.5 ± 3.3
461 34.1 ± 0.9 44
462 (22.6 ± 0.5)56
460 (25.3 ± 1.0)57
459 30.1 ± 0.5 57
459c 31.0 ± 0.9d
Fe(Meacac)3 461 31.8 ± 3.0e 19.7 ± 4.7
Fe(tfac)3 389 38.0 ± 5.5f 31.2 ± 5.4g
Fe(hfac)3 329 31.3 ± 3.6f 28.5 ± 3.5g
Fe(ba)3 496 34.2 ± 3.0e 17.4 ± 5.9
Fe(dbm)3 539 37.3 ± 3.0e 12.2 ± 8.1
Fe(thd)3 438 30.8 ± 5.9f 14.6 ± 3.4g
a

Uncertainties in this table are expressed as expanded uncertainties at a level of confidence of 0.95 (k = 2). Complete compilation of melting temperatures for tris(β-diketonato)iron(iii) complexes available in the literature is given in Table S2.

b

The enthalpies of fusion, Inline graphic at Tfus were adjusted to 298.15 K (see eqn (6)). Uncertainties in the temperature adjustment of fusion enthalpies from Tfus to the reference temperature are estimated to account with 30% to the total adjustment.58

c

Average value.

d

Weighted mean value. We used the experimental uncertainty as the weighing factor. Values in parenthesis were excluded from the calculation of the mean.

e

Calculated by the multiplication of the fusion temperature Tfus with the Walden constant of 69 ± 2 J K−1 mol−1 (see Table 4) with uncertainty assessed to be ±3.0 kJ mol−1.

f

The enthalpies of fusion, Inline graphic at 298.15 K derived as the difference between experimental sublimation and vaporization enthalpies (see Table 1, column 5, values in bold) were adjusted to Tfus. Uncertainties in the temperature adjustment of fusion enthalpies from the reference temperature to Tfus are estimated to account with 30% to the total adjustment.58

g

The enthalpies of fusion, Inline graphic at 298.15 K were calculated as the differences Inline graphic (see eqn (7)) taken from Table 1 (column 5, values in bold).