Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;7(7):e156424. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.156424

Figure 5. Treatment with Exendin 9-39 normalizes the effects of SG on embryo size without affecting maternal glycemia.

Figure 5

(A and B) Oral glucose tolerance test and AUC in pregnant mice (E12.5) that had sham or SG surgery and were treated or not treated with Exendin 9-39 during pregnancy. (C and D) Nonfasting and fasting glucose levels of the 4 groups of mice. (E) Weight at E18.5 of the 4 experimental groups. (F and G) Corrected weight of P1 pups and the average weight of litters in the 4 experimental groups. (H) Fraction of SGA pups in the 4 experimental groups. (I) Scatter plot of birth weight as a function of fasting glycemia in E12.5. (J and K) Weight of male and female offspring of the 4 experimental groups. Blue: sham-operated mice or offspring of sham-operated mice untreated with Exendin 9-39 during pregnancy (full) or treated with Exendin 9-39 (dashed); Red: SG-operated mice or offspring of SG-operated mice untreated with Exendin 9-39 during pregnancy (full) or treated with Exendin 9-39 (dashed). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by 2-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test in B–J or by 3-way continuous measures ANOVA in A. In A–D, sham Ex9– n = 14, sham Ex9+ n = 10, SG Ex9– n = 6, SG Ex9+ n = 9; in E, sham Ex9– n = 14, sham Ex9+ n = 10, SG Ex9– n = 6, SG Ex9+ n = 9; in F, sham Ex9– n = 155, sham Ex9+ n = 98, SG Ex9– n =107, SG Ex9+ n = 85; in G, sham Ex9– n = 16, sham Ex9+ n = 10, SG Ex9– n =10, SG Ex9+ n = 8; in I, sham Ex9– n = 13, sham Ex9+ n = 10, SG Ex9– n = 6, SG Ex9+ n = 9; in J, sham Ex9– n = 16, sham Ex9+ n = 16, SG Ex9– n = 25, SG Ex9+ n = 11.