Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2020 Nov 10;10(67):40882–40893. doi: 10.1039/d0ra07440c

Specific surface area, pore volume, and average pore size of different catalysts.

Name of catalysts	Specific surface area (BET) (m² g⁻¹)	Pore volume (cm³ g⁻¹)				Average pore size (nm)
Name of catalysts	Specific surface area (BET) (m² g⁻¹)	Micropore	Mesopore	Macropore	Total pore volume	Average pore size (nm)
Ru–ZSM-5	297 ± 0.10	0.19 ± 0.00^a	0.07 ± 0.01^b	0.04 ± 0.01^b	0.27 ± 0.01^c	3.65 ± 0.01^c
ZSM-5	363 ± 11.30	0.23 ± 0.02^a	0.06 ± 0.01^b	0.04 ± 0.01^b	0.32 ± 0.01^c	3.56 ± 0.01^c
Ru–AC	693 ± 3.40	0.32 ± 0.01^d	0.26 ± 0.01^d	—	0.65 ± 0.03^c	1.88 ± 0.03^c
AC	776 ± 18.60	0.35 ± 0.01^d	0.34 ± 0.01^d	—	0.75 ± 0.01^c	1.89 ± 0.02^c
AB	3256 ± 42.40	1.30 ± 0.03^d	0.29 ± 0.03^d	—	1.78 ± 0.01^c	1.10 ± 0.01^c
HB	109 ± 4.20	—	—	—	0.09 ± 0.00^c	1.64 ± 0.06^c

^a

Satio–Foley method (SF).

^b

Dollimore–Heal method (DH).

^c

Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET).

^d

Density functional theory method (DFT).