The comparisons of various CDs for anti-bacteriala.
| CDs | Size (nm) | ζ-Potential (mV) | Strain | MIC (mg mL−1) | MBC (mg mL−1) | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dou et al.13 | ND | 3.5 | ND | E. coli | 0.64 | ND | |
| S. aureus | 0.32 | ||||||
| Travlou et al.14 | N-CDs | 6.5 | −6.47 | E. coli | 0.16 | ND | |
| S-CDs | 5.0 | −47.18 | B. subtilis | 0.32 | |||
| Yang, et al.15 | Negative-charge CDs | 4.0 | −16.00 | S. aureus | 0.008 | ND | |
| Bing et al.27 | Negative-charge candle-soot CDs | 2.93 | −19.50 | E. coli | ND | ND | 0.3 mg mL−1 of C-dots exhibited the bacteriostatic ability toward E. coli |
| This study | Negative-charge CDs | 2.5 | −11.06 | MRSA | 0.63 | 2.5 | |
| VISA | 0.63 | 1.25 |
ND: no detection.