Comparison of the performance of the modified SERS vs. different methods of detection of IAA.
| Entry | Method | Matrix | Detection limit/μM | Analytical timeb | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HPLC (CMMIPs) | Plant tissues | 0.025 | >12 h | 26 |
| 2 | Differential pulse voltammetry (MWCNT-CS/GCE) | Pea root extracts | 0.1 | >12 h | 27 |
| 3 | Square wave voltammetry (BDD) | Vegetable samples | 1.22 | >12 h | 28 |
| 4 | Ampromerty (hemin/rGO/GCE) | Tomato samples | 0.074 | —a | 29 |
| 5 | Ampromerty (AuNP-GH/GCE) | Phosphate buffer solution | 0.21 | —a | 30 |
| 6 | Ampromerty (MWCNTs-DHP-GCE) | Plant leaves | 0.02 | >12 h | 31 |
| 7 | Electrochemical method (PST–rGO) | Plant leaves | 0.05 | >12 h | 32 |
| 8 | Electrochemical method (carbon tape-modified electrode) | Whole pea seedlings | 0.1 | <5 min | 33 |
| 9 | Chemiluminescence (trivalent silver) | Human urine, mung bean sprouts and soil samples | 4 × 10−7 | —a | 34 |
| 10 | Photoelectrochemical immunoassay | Plant seeds | 2.59 × 10−7 | —a | 35 |
| 11 | Capillary electrophoresis | Banana, cabbage and cucumber extracts | 3.48 × 10−6 | —a | 36 |
| 12 | Colorimetry | No real sample | 7.8 × 10−2 | —a | 37 |
| 13 | Fluorometry | Fruit juice | 6.23 × 10−5 | —a | 38 |
| 10 | SERS coupled with Au nanoparticles substrate | Human serum and urine | 0.05 | <5 min | Our study |
The analytical time was not reported.
Total analytical time included both sample preparation and detection.