Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 8;10(71):43489–43496. doi: 10.1039/d0ra06123a

Comparison of the performance of the modified SERS vs. different methods of detection of IAA.

Entry Method Matrix Detection limit/μM Analytical timeb Ref.
1 HPLC (CMMIPs) Plant tissues 0.025 >12 h 26
2 Differential pulse voltammetry (MWCNT-CS/GCE) Pea root extracts 0.1 >12 h 27
3 Square wave voltammetry (BDD) Vegetable samples 1.22 >12 h 28
4 Ampromerty (hemin/rGO/GCE) Tomato samples 0.074 a 29
5 Ampromerty (AuNP-GH/GCE) Phosphate buffer solution 0.21 a 30
6 Ampromerty (MWCNTs-DHP-GCE) Plant leaves 0.02 >12 h 31
7 Electrochemical method (PST–rGO) Plant leaves 0.05 >12 h 32
8 Electrochemical method (carbon tape-modified electrode) Whole pea seedlings 0.1 <5 min 33
9 Chemiluminescence (trivalent silver) Human urine, mung bean sprouts and soil samples 4 × 10−7 a 34
10 Photoelectrochemical immunoassay Plant seeds 2.59 × 10−7 a 35
11 Capillary electrophoresis Banana, cabbage and cucumber extracts 3.48 × 10−6 a 36
12 Colorimetry No real sample 7.8 × 10−2 a 37
13 Fluorometry Fruit juice 6.23 × 10−5 a 38
10 SERS coupled with Au nanoparticles substrate Human serum and urine 0.05 <5 min Our study
a

The analytical time was not reported.

b

Total analytical time included both sample preparation and detection.