Table 3.
Cognitive Test Performance: Descriptive Statistics and Between-Group Comparisons (N = 204)
| Group |
|
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | MWH | MCVR | |||
| Variable | (n = 81) | (n = 68) | (n = 55) | p | Partial eta2 |
|
| |||||
| Domain T−score | |||||
| Motor skills | 49.24 (8.27) | 46.97 (9.56) | 50.25 (9.83) | .120 | .021 |
| Processing speed | 54.41 (12.21) | 45.12 (8.40) | 54.95 (9.03) | < .001*** a | .163 |
| Attention and working memory | 51.76 (8.66) | 46.90 (6.13) | 53.98 (6.54) | < .001*** b | .133 |
| Language | 54.92 (10.19) | 50.59 (10.60) | 56.03 (10.56) | .008** c | .047 |
| Learning | 51.74 (9.95) | 48.90 (8.01) | 54.63 (8.42) | .002** d | .059 |
| Memory | 54.46 (10.29) | 50.89 (7.68) | 58.26 (9.01) | < .001*** e | .090 |
| Executive function | 52.51 (10.73) | 47.35 (8.29) | 53.71 (9.44) | < .001***f | .074 |
| Global T−score | 52.72 (7.54) | 48.10 (5.09) | 54.88 (5.74) | < .001***g | .158 |
| GDS | 0.29 (0.40) | 0.47 (0.36) | 0.19 (0.22) | < .001***h | .096 |
Note. Data presented are means, with standard deviations in parentheses. MWH = men with HIV; MCVR = men with cardiovascular risk; GDS = global deficit score.
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons: MWH vs MCVR, p < .001; MWH vs controls, p < .001; MCVR vs controls, p = .950.
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons: MWH vs MCVR, p < .001; MWH vs controls, p < .001; MCVR vs controls, p = .196.
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons: MWH vs MCVR, p = .004; MWH vs controls, p = .012; MCVR vs controls, p = .544.
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons: MWH vs MCVR, p = .001; MWH vs controls, p = .132; MCVR vs controls, p = .157.
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons: MWH vs MCVR, p < .001; MWH vs controls, p = .048; MCVR vs controls, p = .048.
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons: MWH vs MCVR, p = .001; MWH vs controls, p = .004; MCVR vs controls, p = .756.
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons: MWH vs MCVR, p < .001; MWH vs controls, p < .001; MCVR vs controls, p = .127.
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons: MWH vs MCVR, p < .001; MWH vs controls, p = .006; MCVR vs controls, p = .191.