Comparison results of boosting and dual-RBF model using the modeling data in the literature.3.
| Method | R 2 | R cv5 2 | R T 2 | Hyper parameters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boosting | 0.97 | 0.83 | 0.81 | — |
| Dual-RBF | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.83 | δ 1 = 1.4700 ε1 = 0.0090 |
| δ 2 = 11.1000 ε2 = 0.0249 |
| Method | R 2 | R cv5 2 | R T 2 | Hyper parameters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boosting | 0.97 | 0.83 | 0.81 | — |
| Dual-RBF | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.83 | δ 1 = 1.4700 ε1 = 0.0090 |
| δ 2 = 11.1000 ε2 = 0.0249 |