Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2022 May 2;377(1853):20210168. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0168

Pollinator selection against toxic nectar as a key facilitator of a plant invasion

Paul A Egan 1,, Philip C Stevenson 2,3, Jane C Stout 4
PMCID: PMC9058527  PMID: 35491597

Abstract

Plant compounds associated with herbivore defence occur widely in floral nectar and can impact pollinator health. We showed previously that Rhododendron ponticum nectar contains grayanotoxin I (GTX I) at concentrations that are lethal or sublethal to honeybees and a solitary bee in the plant's non-native range in Ireland. Here we further examined this conflict and tested the hypotheses that nectar GTX I is subject to negative pollinator-mediated selection in the non-native range, but that phenotypic linkage between GTX I levels in nectar and leaves acts as a constraint on independent evolution. We found that nectar GTX I experienced negative directional selection in the non-native range, in contrast to the native Iberian range, and that the magnitude and frequency of pollinator limitation indicated that selection was pollinator-mediated. Surprisingly, nectar GTX I levels were decoupled from those of leaves in the non-native range, which may have assisted post-invasion evolution of nectar without compromising the anti-herbivore function of GTX I (here demonstrated in bioassays with an ecologically relevant herbivore). Our study emphasizes the centrality of pollinator health as a concept linked to the invasion process, and how post-invasion evolution can be targeted toward minimizing lethal or sub-lethal effects on pollinators.

This article is part of the theme issue ‘Natural processes influencing pollinator health: from chemistry to landscapes’.

Keywords: phenotypic selection, post-invasion evolution, toxic nectar, plant–herbivore–pollinator interactions

1. Introduction

The occurrence of toxins in nectar may appear paradoxical since this is the primary reward for pollinators [1,2], but it is nonetheless widespread across many plant families [35]. While the occurrence of toxic or deterrent phytochemicals in nectar could be maladaptive for plant fitness if they impact pollinator health, they may also increase exclusivity or fidelity of pollinator visitation and thereby the efficiency of pollen transfer [3,6]. However, whether nectar phytochemicals are beneficial or detrimental to plant fitness can also be context-dependent [7]. Yet despite both these potential beneficial and detrimental effects, pollinator-mediated selection either for or against so-called ‘toxic nectar’ has yet to be empirically demonstrated in natural plant populations.

As a model system, we examined natural selection on toxic nectar in native and non-native populations of Rhododendron ponticum L. (Ericaceae). Species in this genus constitutively express diterpene grayanotoxins (GTXs) throughout most plant parts that are toxic to a wide range of insect and other animal species [811]. We previously reported that GTXs occur in R. ponticum nectar [12] and that, while some pollinators such as the buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris L.) can consume GTX at naturally occurring nectar concentrations without adverse effects, other bee species, including honeybees and the solitary mining bee (Andrena scotica Pérez), cannot [13]. Observed lethal and sub-lethal effects resulted from exposure to grayanotoxin I (GTX I) at ecologically relevant nectar concentrations, whereas the deacetyl derivative, grayanotoxin III (GTX III), was non-toxic. Our past work in this system also showed that GTX I, but not GTX III, was notably absent or significantly reduced in non-native populations in Ireland [12]. Given that pollen limitation may be common in non-native R. ponticum populations [14], this suggests that pollinator-mediated selection and loss of nectar toxins could have played a central role in facilitating invasion. Further analysis of this model system thus has the potential to reveal a better understanding of the benefits, trade-offs, and ecological significance of toxic nectar for plants, especially in terms of how plants evolve to optimize interactions with mutualists and antagonists. In this study, we consider the consequences of toxic nectar for pollinator health, and if and how invasive plants can evolve to maximize the services of pollinators while maintaining their defence against herbivores.

Beyond their potential influence on pollinator health, GTXs also serve as highly effective herbivore antifeedants in Rhododendron species [811]. Phenotypic correlation between defence-related compounds in nectar and other plant parts (such as leaves and phloem) appears to be a common phenomenon across plant families [5,1517]. Thus, the potential for conflicting pressure on GTXs from pollinators and herbivores exists across all plant parts. To investigate this possibility, we employed a path analysis framework to assess the direction and magnitude of phenotypic selection on leaf, flower and nectar GTXs in native and non-native R. ponticum populations. This approach allowed us to devise a realistic path model—reflecting foliar biogenesis of GTXs [18,19] leading to linked expression in flowers and nectar—to quantify the extent to which phenotypic selection on a certain plant part was imposed directly, and indirectly (i.e. arising from phenotypic linkage with other plant parts). Complementary to phenotypic selection analysis, we also undertook manipulative experiments with pollinators and herbivores to examine their roles as potential selective agents.

The main objective of this study, therefore, was to examine if pollinators potentially drive post-invasion evolution of nectar and an important plant defence trait, and thereby act as key facilitators of invasion by the entomophilous species R. ponticum. In particular, we tested the hypotheses that: (1) the direction and magnitude of natural selection on nectar GTX I varies across the native and non-native range of R. ponticum, consistent with the reduced levels observed in non-native populations; (2) pollinators are important drivers of this selection in the non-native range (i.e. pollinator limitation of plant fitness is correlated with nectar GTX I levels); (3) GTX I levels in nectar are phenotypically correlated with those in leaves and flowers, which should, therefore, also show reduced levels in the non-native range; and (4) that any reduction in leaf GTX I represents a trade-off owing to its adaptive value against herbivory (determined in a feeding bioassay with an ecologically important insect herbivore).

2. Methods

(a) . Location, traits and abiotic variables measured

The study was conducted in nine native populations of R. ponticum subsp. baeticum in southern Spain and northern and southern Portugal, and four populations in the species' non-native range in Ireland (electronic supplementary material, table S1). Between six and ten plants were sampled per population, which typically numbered about 20–30 flowering individuals. A minimum distance of 20 m was kept between individuals so as to reduce the chance of sampling ramets. For each plant individual, nectar, leaf and corolla material was collected, and floral morphological and abiotic variables were quantified. Nectar was collected from between 8 and 15 unbagged flowers using microcapillary tubes and was pooled until ca 1 µl was obtained per plant. This volume was more than sufficient to obtain large quantifiable peaks for GTX I in liquid chromatoraphy–mass spectroscopy (LC–MS) analysis (see below). So as to standardize the time point of collection across individuals, nectar was sampled from flowers in their beta-phase of phenology around the time of stigma receptivity [20]. From each flower that nectar was sampled, the corolla and nearest sutending leaf were also removed and immersed in silica gel in snap-seal bags in a composite sample for each plant. The appropriateness of this sampling technique was supported by the fact that GTXs are known to function as constitutive defences in plants (as opposed to being specifically induced by damage) [9] and are comparatively stable in dried tissues and in solution [21,22]. Nonetheless, care was taken not to damage any plant tissue until after nectar samples were collected. In the laboratory, water was removed by freeze-drying nectar and oven-drying leaf and flower samples at less than 50°C. Dried flower and leaf samples (30 mg) were ground to a homogeneous powder and extracted (3 × 20 ml) in MeOH, from which a 200 µl aliquot was transferred to analysis vials. Dried nectar was re-suspended in 200 µl MeOH for analysis. Quantification of GTX I was carried out by LC–MS analysis as previously reported [12]. Final values of GTX I were expressed as a concentration of dry weight of tissue (µg mg−1 dw). Mean corolla width (measured as the widest horizontal distance between the tips of petal wings) and corolla tube width (measured as the internal diameter of the corolla tube at its base) were recorded with dial callipers from five flowers per plant [23]. We previously reported that several microhabitat factors (canopy cover, aspect, elevation and irradiance) explained a significant amount of variation in nectar toxin levels in R. ponticum [12]. Where appropriate, we used these variables to control for the confounding effect of environmental heterogeneity in models featuring toxin levels as an explanatory variable.

(b) . Relative fitness and pollinator limitation

Maternal fitness was measured as total seed set per plant. Calculation of seed set in tall, profusely flowering shrub or tree species can prove challenging, and hence a sub-sampling approach is often employed [24,25]. To obtain estimates of total seed set in R. ponticum plants, we first calculated mean seed set from 8 to 40 capsules (depending on flower abundance per plant). Established regression equations from native and non-native populations [20,26] were used to estimate viable seed number based on mature capsule length. Viable and non-viable seeds are easily discerned in this species owing to the miniscule size and weight of the latter. To then estimate the total number of flowers per plant, we counted the number of flower trusses (racemes consisting of a pseudo-whorl of usually 9–12 flowers) per individual and multiplied this by the mean flower number (inclusive of those at pre- and post-anthesis stage) obtained from 15 to 20 trusses. Although not all flowers mature into fruiting capsules, these measures are nonetheless highly correlated in R. ponticum [20]. Finally, we multiplied total number of flowers per plant by the mean seed set per capsule to afford total seed set. Relative fitness was calculated by dividing individual seed set by the native or non-native range mean.

A cohort of five individuals per population was selected for application of a supplementary pollination treatment to measure pollinator limitation. Although R. ponticum is self-fertile, optimal seed set occurs under out-crossing [26], and in particular as a result of intrapopulation cross-pollination [20]. The supplemental treatment thus consisted of application of recently dehisced anthers from neighbouring plants (greater than or equal to 35 m distance away) to receptive stigmas of target flowers, ensuring deposition of the long viscin pollen threads. The treatment was implemented at the start of the flowering period (late April in the native range; early June in the non-native range) when the activity of important pollinators (e.g. bumblebees, and solitary bees) was apparent [27]. Both treated flowers, and non-treated control flowers at the same phenological stage, were tagged and collected just preceding capsule dehiscence (mid-October in the native range; late January in the non-native range), with an overall retrieval rate of 88% (owing to wind damage, natural excision etc.). Pollinator limitation was, therefore, assumed in plants where supplementally treated flowers exhibited significantly higher seed set than open-pollinated control flowers, according to one-tailed Welch's t-tests. The resultant t-value of this test was taken as a continuous, quantitative measure of the magnitude of pollinator limitation per plant. While the ability to differentially allocate resources to out-crossed flowers has been noted in some species [28,29], we did not believe this to be a confounding issue in our measure of pollinator limitation given the large gradients and spatially consistent patterns that were subsequently observed.

(c) . Field and experimental assessment of resistance to herbivory

All plants from which traits were measured were also surveyed for herbivore damage at the same time as when pollinator treatments were initiated in the native range (see above) and in early to mid-July in the non-native range. These time points hence permitted sufficient current-season herbivore damage to accumulate, in addition to previous years' damage evident on older leaves. Owing to the typically large size of shrubs, we assessed herbivore damage in 1 m3 areas at the edge of individuals from ground level upwards. The total number of young and old leaves within this area was counted, and the number of leaves exhibiting herbivore damage was recorded for each age class. If present, the area of damage on leaves was usually consistent (ca 10–15% area removed). A generalist species of broad-nosed weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Entiminae) known to feed on R. ponticum in the non-native range [30,31], the black vine weevil (Otiorhynchus sulcatus Fabricius; BVW), was selected for bioassays and reared from larval stage in a glasshouse on strawberry plants. Bioassays with BVWs were conducted using late instar adults in pre-oviposition period; a phase lasting 3–6 weeks, during which time they consume the most plant foliage. Thirty adults were placed into individual arenas (20 × 10 × 6 cm) and randomly allocated to three treatments: (1) a control artificial diet; (2) an artificial diet with GTX I incorporated at natural leaf concentrations; and (3) an artificial diet in which ten times the natural concentrations of GTX I was incorporated. Artificial diets for BVWs were constructed following established techniques [32,33], which consisted of cellulose acetate discs (0.45 µm pore size) treated with water-dissolved sucrose and β-sitosterol phagostimulants at concentrations known to solicit high feeding rates [34]. Sample sizes (the number of BVWs per treatment) were constrained by the limited quantity of GTX I we were able to isolate from several kilograms of dried R. ponticum flowers, as per methods previously reported [35]. However, since there is typically low between-individual variation in BVWs owing to obligate parthenogenesis [36], we considered these sample sizes adequate. Experiments were conducted for a total of 11 days (with a single change of cellulose discs at day 5.5) in conditions maintained at ca 21°C and 85% relative humidity [37,38]. The cumulative area eaten (mm2) from discs was quantified per weevil from digital scans using ImageJ analysis software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). For both field and laboratory assessments, results are reported in terms of resistance (i.e. 1 − herbivore damage).

(d) . Data analysis

(i) . Comparison of GTX I across ranges

Geographical variation in nectar, leaf and flower GTX I levels was analysed in separate linear mixed models (LMMs) fitted by restricted maximum-likelihood estimation using the R package nlme [39]. As three separate LMMs were conducted, we employed Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment of p-values to reduce the family-wise error rate. Non-native plants are known to have originated from Spanish as opposed to Portuguese populations [40], and for this reason we restricted range comparisons to the former only. Nectar, leaf and flower GTX I levels were square-root transformed (to improve normality) and fitted in LMMs as dependant variables against range (native and non-native) as a fixed effect and population as a nested random effect—with microhabitat variables included as covariates. For model validation, standardized residuals were examined for normality, homogeneity and independence, including spatial autocorrelation [41]. Non-equal variance of residuals between populations was accounted for in the leaf GTX I model by incorporation of a variance correlation structure (based on population identity), which significantly improved model Akaike information criterion (AIC) (likelihood-ratio test; L = 20.3, p = 0.016).

(ii) . Natural selection on plant toxin levels

Before implementing selection analyses, we first: (A) controlled traits for potential confounding effects of environmental heterogeneity, as strong abiotic-mediated covariance between traits and fitness can bias estimates of selection gradients [42,43]; and (B) affirmed the legitimacy of pooling population data [44] in order to assess selection at the range level. Details of these steps are provided (see electronic supplementary material, methods). Subsequently, estimates of directional selection were obtained for each range through multiple regression of relative fitness on standardized traits [45] within a path analytical framework—following the terminology of Scheiner et al. [44]. For path models, a hypothesized causal structure between leaf, nectar and flower GTX I levels and relative fitness was assessed. In addition, we tested for nonlinear selection on traits, including quadratic (disruptive/stabilizing) and correlational selection [45]. However, as no significant nonlinear selection was detected (data not shown), we focused on directional selection only. We employed mean-standardization of traits to allow output of mean-standardized selection gradients (βμ) from analyses, as a measure of intensity of selection. These are deemed superior where comparisons of the strength of natural selection are desired, for instance between traits, or across geographical space [46]—with the added advantage of their interpretation as fitness elasticities [47,48]: the resultant change in relative fitness from doubling trait values.

Path and mediation analyses were carried out using the R package ‘lavaan’ [49] for structural equation modelling. Data for both ranges were assessed for multivariate normality by Mardia's test in the R package ‘MVN’ [50]. As neither dataset met this requirement, we opted for robust maximum-likelihood estimation of path coefficients as a non-parametric alternative. Path model goodness-of-fit is reported as the Satorra–Bentler-adjusted χ2, which can provide better approximation of p-values under non-normality. Following the estimation of path coefficients, mediation analysis was employed to test the significance of three parameters in path models: (1) direct selection gradients (βµ) (assessed along forward-connected paths from a trait to fitness, inclusive of any mediation through intermediate traits); (2) indirect selection (assessed as paths that lead forward to fitness first through a backwards step); and (3) total selection differentials (denoted s: the sum of direct and indirect selection) [44,51]. Selection differentials estimated within a path model are also referred to as the ‘predicted covariance’, as values will usually differ from those typically measured (i.e. through simple trait–fitness correlations) in the absence of causal structure [44,52]. As fitness measurements were not taken and/or could not be retrieved on all plants, missing values were case-wise deleted. Final sample sizes for path and mediation analyses were n = 68 (i.e. n = 38 for the native range and n = 30 for the non-native range). These sample sizes are ca 45–60% of the median sample size reported for plants in a systematic review on selection [53], and are at least 10 times the number of model explanatory variables, as per standard guidelines [54].

(iii) . Biotic selection pressures on plant toxin levels

Differences in the frequency and intensity of pollinator limitation between ranges were assessed through Pearson's χ2-test for independence and by t-test, respectively. Following this, multiple regression analyses were conducted for each range, to examine potential biotic and abiotic determinants of pollinator limitation. In addition to nectar toxins, a range of floral morphological (corolla and tube widths) and microhabitat variables (canopy cover, aspect, elevation and irradiance) were considered for inclusion in models as potential co-determinants. Multicollinearity was monitored using variance inflation factors (VIFs). Final regression models contained explanatory variables significant after Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment of p-values. A generalized linear model (GLM) with quasi-binomial errors (to account for overdispersed proportional data) was used to determine if there were differences in resistance to BVW among GTX I treatments (control, normal, ×10). Post hoc Tukey pairwise comparisons were used to determine which treatments were significantly different from one another, using the R package 'multcomp' [55]), and corrected for multiple comparisons by Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment. The frequency of herbivore damage on plants in the field was analysed according to the factors of leaf age and range of provenance (i.e. native or non-native) using Pearson's χ2-test for independence. To investigate whether observed levels of plant resistance (i.e. 1 − herbivore damage) in the field could be explained by leaf GTX I and other microhabitat variables (as listed above) we fitted GLMs for each range with a quasi-binomial distribution (to account for over-dispersion). The overall significance of GLMs was assessed through comparison with a null model, and McFadden's pseudo-R2 was generated to assess model fit.

3. Results

(a) . Natural selection on plant toxin levels

Directional selection on plant toxin levels was apparent in R. ponticum (figure 1 and table 1), with our a priori hypothesis of causal linkage between leaf, flower and nectar GTX I and fitness deemed adequately representative of the observed data in path models for the native (χ2 = 0.86, d.f. = 1, p = 0.347) and non-native range (χ2 = 2.21, d.f. = 1, p = 0.137). However, the intensity and direction of phenotypic selection on traits was not consistent among regions, with strong positive total selection on leaf, flower and nectar GTX I observed for plants in the native range, in contrast to significant negative total selection on nectar GTX I in the non-native range (table 1). This discrepancy is indicative of divergent selection acting on nectar toxin levels, and is consistent with the pattern of phenotypic differentiation in nectar toxin levels found between ranges (figure 2). By contrast, leaf and flower GTX I which were selectively neutral in the non-native range did not differ in their phenotypic expression between ranges (figure 2). Linkage in toxin levels across leaves and nectar, and leaves and flowers, also appeared altered between ranges (figure 1), a breakdown in phenotypic correlation being indicated in the non-native range.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Solved path diagrams for directional selection on traits in the native (top) and non-native (bottom) range of Rhododendron ponticum. Mean-standardized path coefficients are presented, with dashed lines representing negative coefficients, and arrow width indicative of the strength of effect (bold values significant at: *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.001). Direct selection is assessed along forward-connected paths to fitness, inclusive of any mediation through intermediate variables, and indirect selection as paths that lead forward to fitness first through a backwards step. The confounding influence of abiotic environment on traits was controlled for. Path analyses and multiple regressions are based on N = 38 and N = 30 for the native and invasive range respectively, and single correlations between tissues on N = 53 and N = 30. (Online version in colour.)

Table 1.

Mediation analysis of total selection (also referred to as ‘predicted covariance’ within context of a path model (see Methods)) on toxin levels in the native and invasive range, partitioned into direct and indirect components. Total selection (s) on a trait is the sum of all direct selection gradients (β) and indirect selection. Units are mean-standardized selection coefficients (± robust s.e.). Bold values are significant at: *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.001. n.a., not applicable owing to the implied causal structure of path models.

range/trait direct selection indirect selection total selection
β (±s.e.) (±s.e.) s (±s.e.)
native
 leaf 0.324* (±0.103) n.a. 0.324* (±0.103)
 flower 0.002 (±0.090) 0.393* (±0.178) 0.396* (±0.140)
 nectar −0.035 (±0.059) 0.642 (±0.339) 0.607* (±0.299)
invasive
 leaf 0.015 (±0.079) n.a. 0.015 (±0.079)
 flower −0.016 (±0.113) 0.001 (±0.004) −0.015 (±0.113)
 nectar −0.163** (±0.040) 0.055 (±0.052) −0.107* (±0.049)

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Mean toxin levels (GTX I µg mg−1 ± 95% CI) per dried sample type in the native and non-native range of Rhododendron ponticum. For nectar, leaf and flowers, linear mixed models were fitted with ‘range’ as a fixed effect and ‘population’ as a nested random effect and were controlled for abiotic environment. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, significant differences were detected between ranges for nectar (t = 3.82, N[pops] = 13, N[plants] = 87, p = 0.008), but not for leaves (t = 1.81, N[pops] = 10, N[plants] = 66, p = 0.162) or flowers (t = −0.07, N[pops] = 10, N[plants] = 66, p = 0.949).

Decomposition of total selection on traits into direct and indirect components revealed that total selection on nectar and flower toxin levels in the native range is the result of large indirect selection acting through leaves (table 1), while in the non-native range, only direct selection on nectar toxin levels was observed. Within ranges, no instances of conflicting selection on traits were observed (table 1).

(b) . Pollinators as drivers of selection on plant toxin levels

Plants in the native and non-native range differed significantly in the frequency of pollinator limitation experienced (χ2 = 17.6, d.f. = 1, p = ≤0.001), with seed set in 76% of plants in the non-native range found to be pollen-limited, compared with only 15% of plants in the native range. There was also a difference in the intensity of pollinator limitation in plants between the native (mean = 0.95 ± 0.34) and non-native range (mean = 4.24 ± 0.57) (t-test: t = 5.22, d.f. = 44, p = ≤0.001). Subsequently, we examined a range of biotic and abiotic factors to determine potential causes of pollination limitation in each range. The same pattern was observed within both ranges, in that plants which were more highly pollen-limited possessed higher levels of nectar toxins and also wider flower corollas (table 2). However, the strength of association between nectar GTX I and pollen limitation was more than three times greater in the non-native than the native range.

Table 2.

Multiple regression analysis of determinants of pollination limitation. In addition to nectar toxins, a range of floral morphological and microhabitat variables (as listed in Methods) were considered for inclusion in models. Adjusted p-values are reported.

range coefficient (± s.e.) t-value p-value
nativea
 nectar GTX I (µg mg−1) 0.58 (±0.23) 2.52 0.020
 flower corolla width (mm) 0.22 (±0.07) 3.03 0.012
non-nativeb
 nectar GTX I (µg mg−1) 1.83 (±0.76) 2.41 0.027
 flower corolla width (mm) 0.32 (±0.14) 2.24 0.039

aR2 (adj) = 0.35 (F = 7.18, n = 26, p = 0.004).

bR2 (adj) = 0.27 (F = 4.43, n = 20, p = 0.028).

(c) . Herbivores as drivers of selection on plant toxin levels

Evidence from controlled feeding experiments using an ecologically relevant herbivore of R. ponticum indicated that leaf GTX I functions as an important chemical defence conferring resistance to herbivory (figure 3a). Field observations in both the native and non-native range corroborated this finding, in that herbivory levels varied according to leaf age (χ2 = 1159.2, d.f. = 1, p = ≤0.001), with younger leaves exhibiting higher levels of damage and significantly less GTX I than older leaves (paired t-test: t = 4.05, d.f. = 36, p = ≤0.001). However, the apparent ecological value of leaf GTX I in conferring resistance was not consistent across ranges (figure 3b), with herbivore damage to plants much more prevalent in the non-native than native range (χ2 = 2181.8, d.f. = 1, p = ≤0.001). Hence, in the non-native range, a significant association was observed between resistance and leaf GTX I levels (p = 0.008) together with canopy cover (p = 0.014) (quasi-binomial GLM: F2,29 = 5.2, p = 0.014, pseudo R2 = 0.30), while neither of these variables was significant in the native range (quasi-binomial GLM: F2,37 = 0.4, p = 0.700, pseudo R2 = 0.02).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(a) Resistance to black vine weevil (Otiorhynchus sulcatus) feeding as conferred by grayanotoxin I (GTX I mean ± s.e.). Treatments represent artificial diets in which GTX I was absent (control), or incorporated at average leaf levels in Rhododendron pontcium (normal), or 10 times this amount (×10). Each mean differed significantly from the other (at p ≤ 0.05) according to one-tailed Tukey pairwise contrasts (corrected for multiple comparisons). (b) The relationship between leaf GTX I levels and resistance of R. ponticum plants to herbivory in wild populations. A non-significant ‘range × leaf GTX I’ interaction revealed equivalency in this relationship across ranges (ANCOVA homogeneity of slopes: d.f. = 61, p > 0.05). (Online version in colour.)

4. Discussion

This study tested and confirmed the hypothesis that natural selection on a toxic plant chemical defence varied in direction and magnitude across the native and non-native range of an invasive species, given the expectation that mutualists and antagonists should exert conflicting selection pressures on leaves, flowers and nectar. In the native range, positive total selection on toxin levels in flowers and nectar was a result of an indirect selection on leaves, whereas in the non-native range nectar toxin levels experienced negative total selection, while other traits were selectively neutral.

Two lines of evidence supported the second hypothesis tested, that pollinators are important drivers of observed selection on toxic nectar. Firstly, the finding of negative selection on nectar GTX I in the non-native range, coupled with observed phenotypic change in GTX I that is specific to nectar (which is not seen for the comparatively less toxic GTX III [12]), provides evidence consistent with adaptive post-invasion evolution driven by pollinators. Furthermore, direct investigation of biotic selection pressures in both ranges revealed that plants that exhibited high nectar GTX I levels also experienced more pollen limitation. The vast majority of individuals in the non-native range were pollen-limited (compared with just 15% in the native range). This high frequency and intensity of pollen limitation supports that nectar toxin levels were here subject to negative pollinator-mediated selection, given the importance of pollinators as selective agents via seed production when plants are pollen-limited [42,56,57]. Furthermore, owing to the demonstrated sublethal post-ingestive effects of GTX I [13], established pollinators in the non-native range such as solitary bees may be differentially deterred by plant individuals on the basis of nectar toxicity. This type of preferential foraging behaviour by pollinators could be facilitated by the fact that high- and low-toxin-producing plants tend to be spatially aggregated at the patch level within plant populations [12].

Our findings led us to partially reject our third hypothesis, that GTX I levels in nectar are phenotypically correlated with those in leaves and flowers, which should therefore also show reduced levels in the non-native range. While such phenotypic correlation was indeed evident in the native range, this was not the case in the non-native range, where natural selection appears to have been able to act independently on nectar. While theory predicts that phenotypic expression of secondary compounds should become uncoupled across tissue types when these experience opposing selection pressures [58,59], such scenarios have seldom been tested or demonstrated [17]. Our study provides evidence of such an uncoupling, which has seemingly permitted non-native plants to reduce nectar GTX I levels without compromising the notable anti-herbivore function of GTX I in leaves and flowers. Far from a mere uploading of phloem constitutions, the production of floral nectar in plants follows a complex, multi-stage process involving transport or de novo synthesis of components in various nectary ultrastructures [1,60]. Such processes could hence form targets for the adaptive modification of nectar, which here may have permitted natural selection to act directly on nectar GTX I in the non-native range, while not compromising chemical defence in other tissues. By contrast, owing to the observed linkage between tissue types in native plants, positive selection on leaf toxin levels resulted in large indirect selection on nectar toxin levels.

In relation to leaf GTX I levels and biotic selection pressures imposed by herbivores, we accepted our final hypothesis that any reduction in leaf GTX I levels would represent a trade-off owing to its adaptive value against herbivory. Here, positive directional selection was observed on leaf and flower GTX I levels in the native range, consistent with the finding that GTX I conferred resistance against a generalist herbivore of this species, and that young leaves with lower toxin levels showed more herbivore damage throughout populations of both ranges. However, while there was a similarity between ranges in the general form of the relationship between leaf GTX I levels and herbivore resistance, this relationship was only significant in the non-native range, where R. ponticum has evidentially experienced a notable gain in levels of herbivore damage. This scenario represents a seemingly rare contradiction [61,62] of the enemy-release hypothesis, which is often invoked to explain the success of invasive species in their non-native range. Hence, explanation as to finding that leaf and flower toxin levels were under positive selection in the native range, but not so in the invasive range, may therefore relate to the existence of other unmeasured relevant sources of herbivory.

5. Conclusion

Where interactions involving mutualists and antagonists are mediated by the same trait in plants, rarely are pollinators implicated as predominant selective agents [63]. This study, therefore, represents the first evidence, to our knowledge, of pollinator-mediated selection acting on a defence-related compound in nectar. These results also indicate how the possible microevolutionary adaptation of nectar by plants—which is generally held as the most important mediator of interactions with mutualists [1]—may facilitate colonization of exotic habitat, such as occurs in the invasion process. We conclude that pollinator-mediated selection and the subsequent loss of nectar toxins are likely to have played a key role in facilitating invasion by R. ponticum. These findings in addition emphasize the centrality of pollinator health as a concept linked to the invasion process, and how post-invasion evolutionary pressures can minimize lethal or sublethal effects on pollinators. However, beyond only plant invasions, the generality of these findings on pollinator-mediated selection may in fact be broad—given the relatively widespread occurrence of toxic nectar among plant families [3,5], and where species are distributed over large ranges throughout which conflicting selective pressures by pollinators and herbivores may occur.

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge Juan Arroyo and Erin Jo Tiedeken for facilitating the field research, Michael Gaffney for weevil rearing and Geraldine Wright and Mark Brown for their kind input throughout the study.

Data accessibility

Data used in this study are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6p46m [64].

Authors' contributions

P.E.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; P.C.S.: conceptualization, methodology, resources, validation, writing—review and editing; J.C.S.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, writing—review and editing.

All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed herein.

Conflict of interest declaration

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was funded by Science Foundation Ireland (10/RFP/EOB2842, to J.C.S.).

References

  • 1.Heil M. 2011. Nectar: generation, regulation, and ecological functions. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 191-200. ( 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.01.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stevenson PC. 2020. For antagonists and mutualists: the paradox of insect toxic secondary metabolites in nectar and pollen. Phytochem. Rev. 19, 603-614. ( 10.1007/s11101-019-09642-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Adler LS. 2000. The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos 91, 409-420. ( 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910301.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baker HG. 1977. Non-sugar chemical constituents of nectar. Apidologie 8, 349-356. ( 10.1051/apido:19770405) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Palmer-Young EC, Farrell IW, Adler LS, Milano NJ, Egan PA, Junker RR, Irwin RE, Stevenson PC. 2019. Chemistry of floral rewards: intra- and interspecific variability of nectar and pollen secondary metabolites across taxa. Ecol. Monogr. 89, e01335. ( 10.1002/ecm.1335) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stevenson PC, Nicolson SW, Wright GA. 2017. Plant secondary metabolites in nectar: impacts on pollinators and ecological functions. Funct. Ecol. 31, 65-75. ( 10.1111/1365-2435.12761) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gegear RJ, Manson JS, Thomson JD. 2007. Ecological context influences pollinator deterrence by alkaloids in floral nectar. Ecol. Lett. 10, 375-382. ( 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01027.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Elnaggar SF, Doskotch RW, Odell TM, Girard L. 1980. Antifeedant diterpenes for the gypsy moth larvae from Kalmia latifolia – isolation and characterization of 10 grayanoids. J. Nat. Prod. 43, 617-631. ( 10.1021/np50011a016) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klocke JA, Mei-Ying H, Shin-Foon C, Kubo I. 1991. Grayanoid diterpene insect antifeedants and insecticides from Rhododendron molle. Phytochemistry 30, 1797-1800. ( 10.1016/0031-9422(91)85015-R) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li Y, Liu Y-B, Yu S-S. 2013. Grayanoids from the Ericaceae family: structures, biological activities and mechanism of action. Phytochem. Rev. 12, 305-325. ( 10.1007/s11101-013-9299-z) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scott-Brown AS, Gregory T, Farrell IW, Stevenson PC. 2016. Leaf trichomes and foliar chemistry mediate defence against glasshouse thrips; Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché) in Rhododendron simsii. Funct. Plant Biol. 43, 1170-1182. ( 10.1071/FP16045) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Egan PA, Stevenson PC, Tiedeken EJ, Wright GA, Boylan F, Stout JC. 2016. Plant toxin levels in nectar vary spatially across native and introduced populations. J. Ecol. 104, 1106-1115. ( 10.1111/1365-2745.12573) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tiedeken EJ. 2015. Ecological impacts of invasive plants on pollinators: studies at an individual, species, and community scale. PhD thesis, Trinity College Dublin.
  • 14.Stout JC, Parnell JAN, Arroyo J, Crowe TP. 2006. Pollination ecology and seed production of Rhododendron ponticum in native and exotic habitats. Biodivers. Conserv. 15, 755-777. ( 10.1007/s10531-004-1065-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adler LS, Wink M, Distl M, Lentz AJ. 2006. Leaf herbivory and nutrients increase nectar alkaloids. Ecol. Lett. 9, 960-967. ( 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00944.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lohaus G, Schwerdtfeger M. 2014. Comparison of sugars, iridoid glycosides and amino acids in nectar and phloem sap of Maurandya barclayana, Lophospermum erubescens, and Brassica napus. PLoS ONE 9, e87689. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0087689) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Manson JS, Rasmann S, Halitschke R, Thomson JD, Agrawal AA. 2012. Cardenolides in nectar may be more than a consequence of allocation to other plant parts: a phylogenetic study of Asclepias. Funct. Ecol. 26, 1100-1110. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02039.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bouvier F, Rahier A, Camara B. 2005. Biogenesis, molecular regulation and function of plant isoprenoids. Prog. Lipid Res. 44, 357-429. ( 10.1016/j.plipres.2005.09.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Masutani T, Hamada M, Kawano E, Iwasa J, Kumazawa Z, Ueda H. 1981. Biosynthesis of grayanotoxins in Leucothoe grayana Max. Incorporation of mevalonic acid and (−)-kaurene into grayanotoxin-III. Agric. Biol. Chem. 45, 1281-1282. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mejías JA, Arroyo J, Ojeda F. 2002. Reproductive ecology of Rhododendron ponticum (Ericaceae) in relict Mediterranean populations. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 140, 297-311. ( 10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00103.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kaplan M, Olgun EO, Karaoglu O. 2014. Determination of grayanotoxins in honey by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry using dilute-and-shoot sample preparation approach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62, 5485-5491. ( 10.1021/jf501560t) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hough RL, Crews C, White D, Driffield M, Campbell CD, Maltin C. 2010. Degradation of yew, ragwort and Rhododendron toxins during composting. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 4128-4137. ( 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.024) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stout JC, Duffy KJ, Egan PA, Harbourne M, Hodkinson TR. 2015. Genetic diversity and floral width variation in introduced and native populations of a long-lived woody perennial. AoB Plants 7, plu087. ( 10.1093/aobpla/plu087) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gomez JM. 2004. Bigger is not always better: conflicting selective pressures on seed size in Quercus ilex. Evolution 58, 71-80. ( 10.1554/02-617) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sobral M, Larrinaga AR, Guitian J. 2010. Do seed-dispersing birds exert selection on optimal plant trait combinations? Correlated phenotypic selection on the fruit and seed size of hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna). Evol. Ecol. 24, 1277-1290. ( 10.1007/s10682-010-9380-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stout JC. 2007. Reproductive biology of the invasive exotic shrub, Rhododendron ponticum L. (Ericaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 155, 373-381. ( 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00719.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tiedeken EJ, Egan PA, Stevenson PC, Wright GA, Brown MJ, Power EF, Farrell I, Matthews SM, Stout JC. 2016. Nectar chemistry modulates the impact of an invasive plant on native pollinators. Funct. Ecol. 30, 885-893. ( 10.1111/1365-2435.12588) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ashman TL, et al. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85, 2408-2421. ( 10.1890/03-8024) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wesselingh RA. 2007. Pollen limitation meets resource allocation: towards a comprehensive methodology. New Phytol. 174, 26-37. ( 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01997.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Judd S, Rotherham ID. 1992. The phytophagous insect fauna of Rhododendron ponticum L. in Britain. Entomologist 111, 134-150. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yela JL, Lawton JH. 1997. Insect herbivore loads on native and introduced plants: a preliminary study. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 85, 275-279. ( 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00258.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bristow PR, Doss RP, Campbell RL. 1979. Membrane-filter bioassay for studying phagostimulartory materials in leaf extracts. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72, 16-18. ( 10.1093/aesa/72.1.16) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shanks CH, Doss RP. 1987. Feeding responses by adults of five species of weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) to sucrose and sterols. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 80, 41-46. ( 10.1093/aesa/80.1.41) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Doss RP, Shanks CH. 1984. Black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), phagostimulants from alpine strawberry. Environ. Entomol. 13, 691-695. ( 10.1093/ee/13.3.691) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tiedeken EJ, Stout JC, Stevenson PC, Wright GA. 2014. Bumblebees are not deterred by ecologically relevant concentrations of nectar toxins. J. Exp. Biol. 217, 1620-1625. ( 10.1242/jeb.097543) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stenberg P, Lundmark M. 2004. Distribution, mechanisms and evolutionary significance of clonality and polyploidy in weevils. Agric. For. Entomol. 6, 259-266. ( 10.1111/j.1461-9555.2004.00231.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fisher JR, Bruck DJ. 2004. A technique for continuous mass rearing of the black vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 113, 71-75. ( 10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00206.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shanks CHJ, Finnigan BF. 1973. Temperature and relative humidity effects on eggs and 1st stage larvae of the black vine weevil Otiorhunchus sulcatus. Environ. Entomol. 2, 855-858. ( 10.1093/ee/2.5.855) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team. 2013. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-104. See https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Milne RI, Abbott RJ. 2000. Origin and evolution of invasive naturalized material of Rhododendron ponticum L. in the British Isles. Mol. Ecol. 9, 541-556. ( 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00906.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009. Mixed effects modelling for nested data. In Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, pp. 101-142. Berlin, Germany: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ashman TL, Morgan MT. 2004. Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 553-559. ( 10.1098/rspb.2003.2642) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rausher MD. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits – biases due to environmental convariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46, 616-626. ( 10.2307/2409632) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Scheiner SM, Mitchell RJ, Callahan HS. 2000. Using path analysis to measure natural selection. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 423-433. ( 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00191.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210-1226. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Matsumura S, Arlinghaus R, Dieckmann U. 2012. Standardizing selection strengths to study selection in the wild: a critical comparison and suggestions for the future. Bioscience 62, 1039-1054. ( 10.1525/bio.2012.62.12.6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hereford J, Hansen TF, Houle D. 2004. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution 58, 2133-2143. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01592.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.van Tienderen PH. 2000. Elasticities and the link between demographic and evolutionary dynamics. Ecology 81, 666-679. ( 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0666:eatlbd]2.0.co;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rosseel Y. 2012. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1-36. ( 10.18637/jss.v048.i02) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Korkmaz S, Goksuluk D. 2014. MVN: multivariate normality tests. R package version 3.4. See https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MVN/MVN.pdf.
  • 51.Kingsolver JG, Schemske DW. 1991. Path analyses of selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 276-280. ( 10.1016/0169-5347(91)90004-H) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. 2013. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Siepielski AM, Gotanda KM, Morrissey MB, Diamond SE, DiBattista JD, Carlson SM. 2013. The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1382-1392. ( 10.1111/ele.12174) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mitchell RJ. 2001. Path analysis: pollination. In Design and analysis of ecological experiments, 2nd edn (eds Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J), pp. 217-234, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometr. J. 50, 346-363. ( 10.1002/bimj.200810425) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bartkowska MP, Johnston MO. 2012. Pollinators cause stronger selection than herbivores on floral traits in Lobelia cardinalis (Lobeliaceae). New Phytol. 193, 1039-1048. ( 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04013.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Johnston MO. 1991. Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Lobelia with different pollinators. Evolution 45, 1468-1479. ( 10.2307/2409893) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kessler A, Halitschke R. 2009. Testing the potential for conflicting selection on floral chemical traits by pollinators and herbivores: predictions and case study. Funct. Ecol. 23, 901-912. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01639.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McCall AC, Irwin RE. 2006. Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1351-1365. ( 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00975.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kram BW, Carter CJ. 2009. Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for functional nectary analysis. Sex. Plant Reprod. 22, 235-246. ( 10.1007/s00497-009-0112-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Litt AR, Cord EE, Fulbright TE, Schuster GL. 2014. Effects of invasive plants on arthropods. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1532-1549. ( 10.1111/cobi.12350) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Maron JL, Vila M. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95, 361-373. ( 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950301.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Egan PA, Muola A, Parachnowitsch AL, Stenberg JA. 2021. Pollinators and herbivores interactively shape selection on strawberry defence and attraction. Evol. Lett. 5, 636-643. ( 10.1002/evl3.262) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Egan PA, et al. 2022. Data from: Plant toxin levels in nectar vary spatially across native and introduced populations. ( 10.5061/dryad.6p46m) [DOI]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Egan PA, et al. 2022. Data from: Plant toxin levels in nectar vary spatially across native and introduced populations. ( 10.5061/dryad.6p46m) [DOI]

Data Availability Statement

Data used in this study are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6p46m [64].


Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES