Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;10(73):44747–44755. doi: 10.1039/d0ra08834j

Comparison of Ag and Ag/Au SERS substrates and their EFs.

S. No. SERS substrates Analyte (concentration) Peaks (cm−1) EF Ref.
1 Silver nanodendrites R6G (10−9 M) 613 0.85 × 108 This work
2 Silver nanocubes R6G (10−7 M) 611 8.7 × 1010 45
3 Ultrafast laser photoreduction of Ag+ R6G (1 mM) 612 1 × 1011 46
4 Silver nanodendrites supported on Al sheets R6G (10−6 M) 612 6.6 × 103 47
5 Ag/pyramidal Si R6G (10−5 M) 613 6.7 × 103 48
6 Silver nanodendrites RDX (5 × 10−6 M) 884 1.1 × 104 This work
7 Silver nanocubes RDX (10−9 M) 881 9.2 × 1010 45
8 Ag–Au alloy NPs loaded Si micro arrays RDX (10−6 M) 883 9.3 × 104 44
1214 7.5 × 104
9 rGO–Ag nanocomposite RDX (10−12 M) 880 1.0 × 109 49
10 Gold nanoparticles RDX (10−5 M) 882 1.0 × 104 52
11 Silver nanodendrites AN (10−6 M) 1048 3.1 × 104 This work
12 Ag–Cu NPs AN (5 mM) 1047 3.3 × 104 50
13 AgNPs in PS nanofibers using electrospinning RDX (10−7 M) 872 105 51