Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;7(2):100410. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100410

Table 2.

TTDM and ORR in patients with or without stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC

Patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC
Patients without stage IIIA-N2 NSCLCa
Durvalumab (n = 197) Placebo (n = 90) Durvalumab (n = 279) Placebo (n = 147)
TTDM events, n (%) 51 (25.9) 39 (43.3) 80 (28.7) 59 (40.1)
 TTDM HR (95% CI) 0.45 (0.30-0.69) 0.63 (0.45-0.88)
 Median TTDM (95% CI), months NR (NE-NE) 12.6 (8.7-25.9) 23.2 (17.8-NE) 14.8 (10.6-NE)
ORR, n/N (%)b 62/185 (33.5) 13/83 (15.7) 64/258 (24.8) 21/130 (16.2)
 [95% CI]c [26.8-40.8] [8.6-25.3] [19.7-30.5] [10.3-23.6]

DCO = 13 February 2017 (DCO for the primary analysis of PFS): median follow-up of 14.5 months (range: 0.2-29.9 months). CI, confidence interval; DCO, data cut-off; HR, hazard ratio; NE, not estimable; NR, not reached; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; TTDM, time to death or distant metastasis.

a

Patients with all other stages (including stages IIIA-N0/N1 and IIIB).

b

ORR for response-assessable patients includes unconfirmed responses (N; response-assessable population).

c

ORR 95% CIs were calculated using the Clopper–Pearson method.