Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 21;7(2):100402. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100402

Table 2.

Prognostic factors for overall survival in cohort 1 (synchronous metastatic disease): univariate and multivariate analyses (n = 79)

Characteristics Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Hazard ratio 95% CI P> z Hazard ratio 95% CI P > z
Age at diagnosis (continuous variable) 1.02 1.01 1.04 <0.01 1.02 1.01 1.04 <0.01
Age ≤25 years versus > 25 years old 1.62 0.85 3.07 0.14
Sex (male versus female) 0.89 0.53 1.50 0.66
Year of metastasis diagnosis:
2000-2010 versus <2000 1.51 0.79 2.89 0.21
>2010 versus <2000 1.62 0.81 3.22 0.17
Tumor size of primary tumor <50 mm or >50 mm 2.16 0.29 15.9 0.45
Surgery of the primary tumor yes versus no 0.53 0.31 0.90 0.02 0.58 0.34 0.99 0.04
Surgeon in network versus extra network (n = 42)a 0.64 0.31 1.33 0.23
Margin of primary tumor (n = 33)b
R1 versus R0 1.84 0.74 4.59 0.19
R2 versus R0 4.19 1.05 16.7 0.04
Radiotherapy in perioperative setting versus no 1.04 0.49 2.18 0.93
Metastatic site:
Other single versus lung single 1.74 0.81 3.76 0.15 1.90 0.88 4.15 0.10
Multiple versus lung single 3.59 1.82 7.08 <0.01 3.89 1.93 7.83 <0.01
Local treatment at first metastatic line 0.64 0.37 1.12 0.12
Ifosfamide at first metastatic line versus no 0.64 0.35 1.20 0.14
Doxorubicin at first metastatic line versus no 1.15 0.61 2.20 0.66

Characteristics that are clinically significant are highlighted in bold. Only age at diagnosis and variables that had a P value of significance <0.10 in the univariate analysis were introduced in the semi-parametric multivariate Cox model.

CI, confidence interval.

a

Surgery in network versus extra network was not introduced in multivariate analysis due to missing data.

b

Margin of primary tumor was not introduced in multivariate analysis due to missing data.