Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;7(2):100463. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100463

Table 3.

Second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors following immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Author (year) Design Treatment n Median follow-up (months) ORR (%) Median PFS (months)
Present study Phase II, prospective, single arm Sunitinib 21 15.0 19 5.6
Auvray et al. (2019)9 Retrospective Sunitinib
Axitinib
17
8
22.0 NR 8
7
Wells et al. (2021)17 Retrospective Sunitinib 102 NR 22.5 NR
(TTD 5.4 months)
Ornstein et al. (2019)12 Phase II, prospective, single arm Axitinib 40 8.7 45 8.8
McGregor et al. (2020)14 Retrospective Cabozantinib 86 12.0 36 6.5
Iacovelli et al. (2020)24 Retrospective
Third line and beyond
Cabozantinib 84
(75 for ORR)
NR 52 11.5
Procopio et al. (2021)26 Phase II, prospective (n = 30) and retrospective (n = 19) Cabozantinib 48 8.0 43 9.3
Cao et al. (2020)15 Retrospective Pazopanib 182 (second line) NR NR 16
Powles et al. (2020)25 Phase II, prospective, single arm Pazopanib 47 (second line) NR NR 12
Pal et al. (2020)16 Phase II, randomized, noninferiority trial Lenvatinib 14 mg
Lenvatinib 18 mg
343 (FAS) ? 32.1a
34.8a
11.1
14.7
Rini et al. (2019)5 Phase III, randomized, open-label trial
Third line
Tivozanib
Sorafenib
175
175
19.0 18
8
5.6
3.9

FAS, full analysis set; NR, not reported; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; TTD, time to treatment discontinuation.

a

Investigator assessment.