Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;252:113837. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113837

Table 2.

Model fit indices and structural path estimates for the whole sample (n=318), by parent sex and co-feeding level.

Model Groups χ2 Df p-value RMSEA 95% CI p-value CFI TLI Food parenting → FR Food parenting → EOE Snack parenting → FR Snack parenting → EOE

Whole sample 128.46 59 <.001 .061 .046-.075 .103 .960 .947 -.221 (.061) -.494 (<.001) .240 (.040) .354 (.003)

By sex
(unconstraint)
Mothers (n=206) 229.75 136 <.001 .066 .051-.080 .042 .947 .940 -.211 (.217) -.536 (.003) .340 (.044) .398 (.024)
Fathers (n=112) -.227 (.132) -.434 (.004) -.011 (.942) .262 (.109)
Constraint model 235.41 140 <.001 .065 .051-.080 .044 .946 .940
Model comparison Chi-square difference test
=6

=4

=.226

By co-feeding
(unconstraint)
Low (n=86) 214.32 136 <.001 .064 .047-.081 .080 .96 .938 .138 (.564) -.516 (.040) -.007 (.978) .311 (.226)
High (n=194) -.334 (.014) -.481 (<.001) .246 (.068) .323 (.015)
Constraint model 218.86 140 <.001 .063 .047-.079 .090 .946 .939
Model comparison Chi-square difference test
=5

=4

=.338

Abbreviations: χ2 = Chi-square, Df = degrees of freedom, RMSEA = Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation, CFI = Comparative Fit Index, TLI = Tucker Lewis Index, FR = food responsiveness, EOE = emotional overeating