Content comparisons of mutual components between RAPT and RIPT by UHPLC-PDA^a.

Peak no.	Rt (min)	Peak area		Changes in RIPTb	p-value
		RIPT	RAPT
1	0.48	5413.78 ± 644.21	819.11 ± 162.87		5.4 × 10−13
2	0.91	743.89 ± 402.95	1627.22 ± 680.07	↓	4.0 × 10−3
4	1.21	540.11 ± 223.95	5509.22 ± 1136.93	↓	7.5 × 10−10
5	1.36	27 794.89 ± 14 100.32	20 960.56 ± 4531.10		1.9 × 10−1
7	1.77	1665.11 ± 266.70	31 399.89 ± 1296.43	↓	4.5 × 10−21
8	2.33	129.56 ± 113.96	3462.00 ± 777.84	↓	8.8 × 10−10
9	2.95	98.11 ± 8.16	1196.22 ± 127.16	↓	1.8 × 10−14
10	3.18	10 456.22 ± 248.83	5320.44 ± 1293.96		3.0 × 10−9
11	4.02	193.78 ± 79.17	2829.00 ± 259.68	↓	2.7 × 10−15
12	4.28	600.33 ± 155.54	171.89 ± 45.19	↑	6.2 × 10−7
15	5.8	88.44 ± 2.96	1756.33 ± 492.03	↓	2.2 × 10−8
16	6.1	299.33 ± 65.45	5488.33 ± 560.78	↓	6.5 × 10−15
18	6.48	128.67 ± 41.45	1274.00 ± 200.88	↓	1.4 × 10−11
20	6.88	149 441.78 ± 3758.53	98 945.78 ± 8242.66		1.5 × 10−11
22	7.22	191.89 ± 18.11	2735.89 ± 203.26	↓	5.3 × 10−17
28	9.04	486.44 ± 103.20	1557.89 ± 96.01	↓	1.3 × 10−13
31	9.49	214.78 ± 111.37	9497.00 ± 1907.87	↓	1.2 × 10−10
32	9.86	68.11 ± 50.40	39 900.56 ± 9011.16	↓	4.8 × 10−10
48	14.28	277.67 ± 42.04	186.44 ± 53.65		1.0 × 10−3
49	14.56	188.89 ± 100.50	49 858.67 ± 7605.17	↓	1.3 × 10−12
51	15.13	3704.67 ± 817.51	2069.56 ± 156.84		2.3 × 10−5
52	15.36	281.78 ± 56.62	351.33 ± 58.48	↓	2.1 × 10−2
56	16.04	387.00 ± 175.11	1230.89 ± 127.26	↓	3.0 × 10−9
58	17.05	173.78 ± 77.95	248.78 ± 58.63	↓	3.5 × 10−2
63	18.28	395.44 ± 217.17	1378.11 ± 704.96	↓	1.0 × 10−3
64	18.49	375.56 ± 171.71	761.44 ± 353.08	↓	9.4 × 10−3

^aAll of the results were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). p value was calculated by two-tailed t test.

^bFive key increased components were emphasized with bold arrows.