Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 14;48(3):501–511. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0687

Table 1. Comparison of groups with each other before treatment.

Group 1 Group 2 p
(n=34) (n=34)
Age, years (Mean ± SD) 46.5 ± 9.9 43.1 ± 7.2 0.708
BMI, kg/m2 (Mean ± SD) 24.8 ± 2.2 24.5 ± 2.2 0.896
24-hour frequency (Mean ± SD) 11.2 ± 2.1 11.2 ± 2.0 0.830
Average voided volume, mL (Mean ± SD) 252.2 ± 81.7 261.4 ± 94.4 0.668
Qmax, mL/s, (Mean ± SD) 11.0 ± 2.7 11.1 ± 2.6 0.964
Qave, mL/s (Mean ± SD) 6.0 ± 1.1 6.0 ± 1.1 0.918
PVR, mL (Mean ± SD) 83.2 ± 25.4 82.7 ± 24.8 0.942
UDI-6 score (Median) 13.5 13.5 0.995
EMG activity, n (%) 34 (100) 34 (100) 1††

BMI = Body mass index;Qmax:maximum urine flow rate; Qave = average urine flow rate; PVR = Post-void residual urine volume; UDI-6 = Urogenital Distress Inventory; EMG = electromyography

Kruskal Wallis

††

Intergroup comparison was performed using the Chi-square test