Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 14;48(3):501–511. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0687

Table 2. Intra-Group comparisons of voiding parameters before and after treatment.

Group 1 (n=34) Group 2 (n=34)
Before treatment After treatment p Before treatment After treatment p
24-hour frequency (Mean ± SD) 11.2 ± 2.1 7.7 ± 2.9 <0.001 11.2 ± 2.0 9.0 ± 3.1 0.008
Average voided volume, mL (Mean ± SD) 252.2 ± 81.7 261.7 ± 77.5 0.622 261.4 ± 94.4 258.0 ± 82.0 0.815
Qmax, mL/s, (Mean ± SD) 11.0 ± 2.7 14.8 ± 2.6 0.001 11.1 ± 2.6 12.8 ± 2.9 0.005
Qave, mL/s (Mean ± SD) 6.0 ± 1.1 8.0 ± 1.0 0.001 6.0 ± 1.1 6.7 ± 1.1 0.007
PVR, mL (Mean ± SD) 83.2 ± 25.4 54.7 ± 31.5 <0.001 82.7 ± 24.8 65.7 ± 24.1 0.005
UDI-6 score (Median) 13.5 9 <0.001 13.5 12 0.002
EMG activity, n (%) 34 (100) 14 (41.2) 0.391 34 (100) 22 (64.7) 0.122

Qmax = maximum urine flow rate; Qave = average urine flow rate; PVR = Post-void residual urine volume; UDI-6 = Urogenital Distress Inventory; EMG = electromyography

Intergroup comparison was performed using the Chi-square test