Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Law Med Ethics. 2021;49(4):622–629. doi: 10.1017/jme.2021.85

Table 2.

Potential goals, measures of success, and challenges of policy-driven shared decision-making

Primary goal Measures of Success Challenges
Improved understanding or experience
  • Procedure comprehension

  • Decision making process

  • Patient engagement

  • Patient satisfaction

  • Decision conflict

  • Unclear how to value benefits and costs if decisions are not impacted

  • Defining the scope: unclear how to identify procedures for which shared decision-making should be prioritized

Increasing alignment between patients’ values and choices
  • Values-choice concordance

  • Impact on patients’ choices

  • The extent to which shared decision-making processes and tools such as DAs accomplish this goal is decision specific

  • Longer term impacts are relevant but may be missed and are difficult to study

Reduce costs, utilization, improve healthcare outcomes
  • Healthcare expenditures

  • Number of procedures

  • Survival data or other healthrelated outcomes

  • Indirect connection between these outcomes and shared decision-making process

  • Paradoxical effects are possible (e.g. reduction in implanted ICDs will likely drive an increase in mortality)